A randomised double-blind controlled study of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia in STN or GPi - A long term follow-up after up to 15 years
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
A randomised double-blind controlled study of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia in STN or GPi - A long term follow-up after up to 15 years. / Hock, Aske Nicolai; Jensen, Steen Rusborg; Svaerke, Katrine Wordenskjold; Brennum, Jannick; Jespersen, Bo; Bergdal, Ove; Karlsborg, Merete; Hjermind, Lena Elisabeth; Lokkegaard, Annemette.
In: Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, Vol. 96, 2022, p. 74-79.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - A randomised double-blind controlled study of Deep Brain Stimulation for dystonia in STN or GPi - A long term follow-up after up to 15 years
AU - Hock, Aske Nicolai
AU - Jensen, Steen Rusborg
AU - Svaerke, Katrine Wordenskjold
AU - Brennum, Jannick
AU - Jespersen, Bo
AU - Bergdal, Ove
AU - Karlsborg, Merete
AU - Hjermind, Lena Elisabeth
AU - Lokkegaard, Annemette
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Aim: This is a long-term open follow-up of a prospective double-blind crossover study, where electrodes were bilaterally implanted in both the Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal pallidum (GPi) in patients with isolated dystonia.Methods: Patients with isolated dystonia were included to undergo surgery with Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) and after randomization, in a double-blind cross-over study, receiving bilateral stimulation of either STN or GPi for 6 months in each target. Preoperative and postoperative assessments with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were performed. In this long-term follow-up (LFU), these ratings were repeated, and patients were evaluated with cognitive tests.Results: 21 patients were included in the protocol, 9 patients with generalized dystonia, 12 with a diagnosis of cervical dystonia. The mean duration of disease was 19.3 years, age at time of surgery 50.1 years. Fourteen patients participated in the LFU. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (range 4.8-15.4), BFMDRS movement score was improved with a mean of 36% (p < 0.05) compared with baseline. At LFU both a statistically significant improvement of stimulation in STN on BFMDRS movement score (p = 0.029) and Gpi (p = 0.008) was demonstrated, no significant difference was found between the two targets (p = 0.076). SF-36 improved for both targets.Conclusion: In this study we performed a long-term follow-up in 14 patients with cervical or generalized dystonia, who received stimulation in GPi, STN or both. The mean follow-up time was more than 10 years. Our data support a long-term effect of both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in dystonia with equal effect and safety for up to 15 years. STN has been proven a viable safe and effective target and may be used as an alternative to GPi in both adult-onset cervical dystonia and generalized dystonia.
AB - Aim: This is a long-term open follow-up of a prospective double-blind crossover study, where electrodes were bilaterally implanted in both the Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal pallidum (GPi) in patients with isolated dystonia.Methods: Patients with isolated dystonia were included to undergo surgery with Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) and after randomization, in a double-blind cross-over study, receiving bilateral stimulation of either STN or GPi for 6 months in each target. Preoperative and postoperative assessments with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) were performed. In this long-term follow-up (LFU), these ratings were repeated, and patients were evaluated with cognitive tests.Results: 21 patients were included in the protocol, 9 patients with generalized dystonia, 12 with a diagnosis of cervical dystonia. The mean duration of disease was 19.3 years, age at time of surgery 50.1 years. Fourteen patients participated in the LFU. At a mean follow-up of 10.2 years (range 4.8-15.4), BFMDRS movement score was improved with a mean of 36% (p < 0.05) compared with baseline. At LFU both a statistically significant improvement of stimulation in STN on BFMDRS movement score (p = 0.029) and Gpi (p = 0.008) was demonstrated, no significant difference was found between the two targets (p = 0.076). SF-36 improved for both targets.Conclusion: In this study we performed a long-term follow-up in 14 patients with cervical or generalized dystonia, who received stimulation in GPi, STN or both. The mean follow-up time was more than 10 years. Our data support a long-term effect of both STN-DBS and GPi-DBS in dystonia with equal effect and safety for up to 15 years. STN has been proven a viable safe and effective target and may be used as an alternative to GPi in both adult-onset cervical dystonia and generalized dystonia.
KW - Cervical dystonia
KW - Generalized dystonia
KW - Deep brain stimulation
KW - Internal pallidum
KW - Subthalamic nucleus
KW - Long term follow-up
KW - SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS
U2 - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.001
DO - 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.001
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35245879
VL - 96
SP - 74
EP - 79
JO - Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
JF - Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
SN - 1353-8020
ER -
ID: 315405173