Accuracy of the hypospadias diagnoses and surgical treatment registrations in the Danish National Patient Register

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Linn Hakonsen Arendt
  • Andreas Ernst
  • Morten Sondergaard Lindhard
  • Anne Aggerholm Jonsson
  • Tine Brink Henriksen
  • Jorn Olsen
  • Thorup, Jørgen Mogens
  • L. Henning Olsen
  • Cecilia Host Ramlau-Hansen
Purpose: The Danish National Health registers provide a valuable data source that offers unique opportunities for observational research, including studies on the congenital anomaly hypospadias. The accuracy of the diagnosis and surgical treatment registration of hypospadias in the Danish National Patient Register (DNPR) remains unknown.
Patients and methods: We randomly sampled 500 patients diagnosed with hypospadias in the DNPR from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2012. Among these, 384 patients were also registered with surgical treatment for hypospadias. Medical records were collected and reviewed independently by two investigators. Any classification disagreements were resolved by consensus. Using the medical records as the gold standard, we estimated positive predictive values (PPVs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the hypospadias diagnoses and surgical treatment registrations overall, as well as for the clinical subtypes.
Results: We were able to retrieve medical records for 463 (92.6%) patients with hypospadias diagnoses and for 329 (85.7%) patients registered with surgical treatment. Presence of hypospadias was confirmed in 450 of 463 patients, yielding an overall PPV (95% CI) of 97.6% (95.8%–98.7%). For subtypes of hypospadias, the PPVs ranged between 37.5% and 72.7%. For surgical treatment of hypospadias, the overall PPV was 99.7% (97.9%–99.9%).
Conclusion: The validity of the registration of hypospadias diagnoses as well as surgical treatment for hypospadias in the DNPR is overall very high. For the specific subtypes of hypospadias diagnoses codes and the specific surgical treatment codes, the PPVs are lower and cautious use is warranted. However, the DNPR remains a valuable tool for future observational research on hypospadias.
Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical Epidemiology
Volume2017
Issue number9
Pages (from-to)483—489
ISSN1179-1349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Research areas

  • data quality, epidemiology, hospital register diagnoses, ICD-10, positive predictive value

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 184767402