Assessment of Liver Fat: Dual-Energy CT versus Conventional CT with and without Contrast

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Final published version, 8.77 MB, PDF document

We assessed the correlation between liver fat percentage using dual-energy CT (DECT) and Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements in contrast and non-contrast CT. This study included 177 patients in two patient groups: Group A (n = 125) underwent whole body non-contrast DECT and group B (n = 52) had a multiphasic DECT including a conventional non-contrast CT. Three regions of interest were placed on each image series, one in the left liver lobe and two in the right to measure Hounsfield Units (HU) as well as liver fat percentage. Linear regression analysis was performed for each group as well as combined. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to establish the optimal fat percentage threshold value in DECT for predicting a non-contrast threshold of 40 HU correlating to moderate-severe liver steatosis. We found a strong correlation between fat percentage found with DECT and HU measured in non-contrast CT in group A and B individually (R-2 = 0.81 and 0.86, respectively) as well as combined (R-2 = 0.85). No significant difference was found when comparing venous and arterial phase DECT fat percentage measurements in group B (p = 0.67). A threshold of 10% liver fat found with DECT had 95% sensitivity and 95% specificity for the prediction of a 40 HU threshold using non-contrast CT. In conclusion, liver fat quantification using DECT shows high correlation with HU measurements independent of scan phase.

Original languageEnglish
Article number708
JournalDiagnostics
Volume12
Issue number3
Number of pages10
ISSN2075-4418
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

    Research areas

  • liver fat quantification, dual-energy CT, spectral CT, HEPATIC STEATOSIS, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY, QUANTIFICATION, FRACTION, DISEASE, ADULTS, DECOMPOSITION, DIAGNOSIS

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 308048139