Cardiotocography combined with ST analysis versus cardiotocography combined with fetal blood sampling in deliveries with abnormal CTG: a randomized trial

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Simon Foged Victor
  • Diana Bøttcher Brøndum Bach
  • Anna Carolina Hvelplund
  • Carsten Nickelsen
  • Jens Lyndrup
  • Charlotte Wilken-Jensen
  • Lise Jul Scharff
  • Tom Weber
  • Niels Jørgen Secher
  • Krebs, Lone
Methods
We performed a two-center randomized trial. 1013 women with term fetuses in cephalic presentation entered the trial. If a CTG showed intermediate or pathological abnormalities, they were offered fetal blood sampling (FBS) and inclusion if the pH value was above 7.25. They were randomized to either CTG + FBS or CTG + STAN. The primary outcome was neonatal metabolic acidosis, defined as umbilical cord arterial blood pH below 7.05, and base excess equal to or below −10. The secondary outcomes included operative vaginal delivery for fetal distress.

Results
The rate of metabolic acidosis was 0.8% in the CTG + FBS group and 1.5% in women in the CTG + STAN (P = 0.338). More women in the CTG + STAN group delivered by operative vaginal delivery (25.6% vs 33.5%, P = 0.006). Significantly fewer women in the CTG + STAN group had three to five (28.8% vs 11.0%, P =  < 0.001) and six to ten fetal blood samples taken (3.4% vs 0.4%, P =  < 0.001).

Conclusion
CTG + STAN did not reduce the incidence of neonatal metabolic acidosis compared to CTG + FBS. CTG + STAN was, however, associated with an increased risk of operative vaginal delivery and a reduced use of FBS. If STAN is used for fetal surveillance, we recommend that it is combined with other methods, such as FBS, for confirmation of the need for operative delivery.
Original languageEnglish
JournalArchives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Volume307
Issue number6
Pages (from-to)1771–1780
Number of pages10
ISSN0932-0067
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

ID: 310638892