Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology : A Delphi-based general needs assessment. / Bessmann, Ebbe L.; Østergaard, Helle T.; Nielsen, Bjørn U.; Russell, Lene; Paltved, Charlotte; Østergaard, Doris; Konge, Lars; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy.

In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2019, p. 720-729.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Bessmann, EL, Østergaard, HT, Nielsen, BU, Russell, L, Paltved, C, Østergaard, D, Konge, L & Nayahangan, LJ 2019, 'Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13344

APA

Bessmann, E. L., Østergaard, H. T., Nielsen, B. U., Russell, L., Paltved, C., Østergaard, D., Konge, L., & Nayahangan, L. J. (2019). Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 63(6), 720-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13344

Vancouver

Bessmann EL, Østergaard HT, Nielsen BU, Russell L, Paltved C, Østergaard D et al. Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019;63(6):720-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.13344

Author

Bessmann, Ebbe L. ; Østergaard, Helle T. ; Nielsen, Bjørn U. ; Russell, Lene ; Paltved, Charlotte ; Østergaard, Doris ; Konge, Lars ; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy. / Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology : A Delphi-based general needs assessment. In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019 ; Vol. 63, No. 6. pp. 720-729.

Bibtex

@article{f390e5cd96bd43be92ebdc2187fd2d79,
title = "Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment",
abstract = "Background: Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods: A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results: All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion: The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.",
author = "Bessmann, {Ebbe L.} and {\O}stergaard, {Helle T.} and Nielsen, {Bj{\o}rn U.} and Lene Russell and Charlotte Paltved and Doris {\O}stergaard and Lars Konge and Nayahangan, {Leizl Joy}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/aas.13344",
language = "English",
volume = "63",
pages = "720--729",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology

T2 - A Delphi-based general needs assessment

AU - Bessmann, Ebbe L.

AU - Østergaard, Helle T.

AU - Nielsen, Bjørn U.

AU - Russell, Lene

AU - Paltved, Charlotte

AU - Østergaard, Doris

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods: A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results: All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion: The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.

AB - Background: Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods: A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results: All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion: The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.

U2 - 10.1111/aas.13344

DO - 10.1111/aas.13344

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30874309

AN - SCOPUS:85062966267

VL - 63

SP - 720

EP - 729

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 240198562