Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology: A Delphi-based general needs assessment
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology : A Delphi-based general needs assessment. / Bessmann, Ebbe L.; Østergaard, Helle T.; Nielsen, Bjørn U.; Russell, Lene; Paltved, Charlotte; Østergaard, Doris; Konge, Lars; Nayahangan, Leizl Joy.
In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2019, p. 720-729.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus on technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology
T2 - A Delphi-based general needs assessment
AU - Bessmann, Ebbe L.
AU - Østergaard, Helle T.
AU - Nielsen, Bjørn U.
AU - Russell, Lene
AU - Paltved, Charlotte
AU - Østergaard, Doris
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Nayahangan, Leizl Joy
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods: A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results: All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion: The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.
AB - Background: Anaesthesiologists are expected to master an increasing number of technical procedures. Simulation-based procedural training can supplement and, in some areas, replace the classical apprenticeship approach during patient care. However, simulation-based training is very resource-intensive and must be prioritised and optimised. Developing a curriculum for simulation-based procedural training should follow a systematic approach, eg the Six-Step Approach developed by Kern. The aim of this study was to conduct a national general needs assessment to identify and prioritise technical procedures for simulation-based training in anaesthesiology. Methods: A three-round Delphi process was completed with anaesthesiology key opinion leaders. In the first round, the participants suggested technical procedures relevant to simulation-based training. In the second round, a needs assessment formula was used to explore the procedures and produce a preliminary prioritised list. In the third round, participants evaluated the preliminary list by eliminating and re-prioritising the procedures. Results: All teaching departments in Denmark were represented with high response rates in all three rounds: 79%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups suitable for simulation-based training from the initial 138 suggestions. Top-5 on the final list was cardiopulmonary resuscitation, direct- and video laryngoscopy, defibrillation, emergency cricothyrotomy, and fibreoptic intubation. The needs assessment formula predicted the final prioritisation to a great extent. Conclusion: The Delphi process produced a prioritised list of 30 procedure groups that could serve as a guide in future curriculum development for the simulation-based training of technical procedures in anaesthesiology.
U2 - 10.1111/aas.13344
DO - 10.1111/aas.13344
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30874309
AN - SCOPUS:85062966267
VL - 63
SP - 720
EP - 729
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-5172
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 240198562