Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study. / Thomsen, Morten G; Latifi, Roshan; Kallemose, Thomas; Husted, Henrik; Troelsen, Anders.

In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, Vol. 17, No. 141, 141, 01.04.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Thomsen, MG, Latifi, R, Kallemose, T, Husted, H & Troelsen, A 2016, 'Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study', BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, vol. 17, no. 141, 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3

APA

Thomsen, M. G., Latifi, R., Kallemose, T., Husted, H., & Troelsen, A. (2016). Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17(141), [141]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3

Vancouver

Thomsen MG, Latifi R, Kallemose T, Husted H, Troelsen A. Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016 Apr 1;17(141). 141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3

Author

Thomsen, Morten G ; Latifi, Roshan ; Kallemose, Thomas ; Husted, Henrik ; Troelsen, Anders. / Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses? A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study. In: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2016 ; Vol. 17, No. 141.

Bibtex

@article{53b4146dea674f74bd7c130b487caad9,
title = "Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses?: A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Low knee awareness after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate goal in trying to achieve a natural feeling knee that meet patient expectations. To accommodate this manufacturers of TKAs have developed new prosthetic designs that potentially could give patients a more natural feeling knee during activities. The purpose af this study was to compare the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of patients treated with a previous generation standard Cruciate Retaining (CR) TKA to the scores obtained by patients treated with a newer generation CR TKA or a mobile bearing CR TKA.METHODS: We identified all patients receiving a new generation CR TKA or mobile bearing TKA at our institution between 2010 and 2012. These were matched to a population of patients receiving a standard CR TKA regarding age, gender, year of surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and pre- and postoperative knee alignment. Patients were asked to complete the FJS and OKS questionnaires. Of the 316 patients completing the survey 64 standard CR TKAs to 35 new generation CR TKAs and 121 standard CR TKAs to 68 mobile bearing TKAs were matched. The FJS and OKS scores of the three TKA designs were compared.RESULTS: When comparing the new generation CR TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found statistically significant higher OKS and FJS scores (6 (p = 0.04) and 16 (p = 0.03) points respectively) for the new generation CR TKAs. When comparing the mobile bearing TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found a statistically significant higher OKS score (3 points, p = 0.04), and a higher but non-significant FJS score (4 points, p = 0.48) for the mobile bearing TKAs.CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving the new generation CR TKA obtained higher FJS and OKS scores when compared to patients receiving a standard CR TKA, indicating that the use of this newer prosthetic design facilitate less knee awareness and better function after TKA.",
keywords = "Aged, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Awareness, Biomechanical Phenomena, Case-Control Studies, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Knee Joint, Knee Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Prosthesis Design, Recovery of Function, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Journal Article",
author = "Thomsen, {Morten G} and Roshan Latifi and Thomas Kallemose and Henrik Husted and Anders Troelsen",
year = "2016",
month = apr,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
journal = "B M C Musculoskeletal Disorders",
issn = "1471-2474",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",
number = "141",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does knee awareness differ between different knee arthroplasty prostheses?

T2 - A matched, case-control, cross-sectional study

AU - Thomsen, Morten G

AU - Latifi, Roshan

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Husted, Henrik

AU - Troelsen, Anders

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Low knee awareness after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate goal in trying to achieve a natural feeling knee that meet patient expectations. To accommodate this manufacturers of TKAs have developed new prosthetic designs that potentially could give patients a more natural feeling knee during activities. The purpose af this study was to compare the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of patients treated with a previous generation standard Cruciate Retaining (CR) TKA to the scores obtained by patients treated with a newer generation CR TKA or a mobile bearing CR TKA.METHODS: We identified all patients receiving a new generation CR TKA or mobile bearing TKA at our institution between 2010 and 2012. These were matched to a population of patients receiving a standard CR TKA regarding age, gender, year of surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and pre- and postoperative knee alignment. Patients were asked to complete the FJS and OKS questionnaires. Of the 316 patients completing the survey 64 standard CR TKAs to 35 new generation CR TKAs and 121 standard CR TKAs to 68 mobile bearing TKAs were matched. The FJS and OKS scores of the three TKA designs were compared.RESULTS: When comparing the new generation CR TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found statistically significant higher OKS and FJS scores (6 (p = 0.04) and 16 (p = 0.03) points respectively) for the new generation CR TKAs. When comparing the mobile bearing TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found a statistically significant higher OKS score (3 points, p = 0.04), and a higher but non-significant FJS score (4 points, p = 0.48) for the mobile bearing TKAs.CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving the new generation CR TKA obtained higher FJS and OKS scores when compared to patients receiving a standard CR TKA, indicating that the use of this newer prosthetic design facilitate less knee awareness and better function after TKA.

AB - BACKGROUND: Low knee awareness after Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) has become the ultimate goal in trying to achieve a natural feeling knee that meet patient expectations. To accommodate this manufacturers of TKAs have developed new prosthetic designs that potentially could give patients a more natural feeling knee during activities. The purpose af this study was to compare the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) of patients treated with a previous generation standard Cruciate Retaining (CR) TKA to the scores obtained by patients treated with a newer generation CR TKA or a mobile bearing CR TKA.METHODS: We identified all patients receiving a new generation CR TKA or mobile bearing TKA at our institution between 2010 and 2012. These were matched to a population of patients receiving a standard CR TKA regarding age, gender, year of surgery, Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade and pre- and postoperative knee alignment. Patients were asked to complete the FJS and OKS questionnaires. Of the 316 patients completing the survey 64 standard CR TKAs to 35 new generation CR TKAs and 121 standard CR TKAs to 68 mobile bearing TKAs were matched. The FJS and OKS scores of the three TKA designs were compared.RESULTS: When comparing the new generation CR TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found statistically significant higher OKS and FJS scores (6 (p = 0.04) and 16 (p = 0.03) points respectively) for the new generation CR TKAs. When comparing the mobile bearing TKAs to the standard CR TKAs we found a statistically significant higher OKS score (3 points, p = 0.04), and a higher but non-significant FJS score (4 points, p = 0.48) for the mobile bearing TKAs.CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving the new generation CR TKA obtained higher FJS and OKS scores when compared to patients receiving a standard CR TKA, indicating that the use of this newer prosthetic design facilitate less knee awareness and better function after TKA.

KW - Aged

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

KW - Awareness

KW - Biomechanical Phenomena

KW - Case-Control Studies

KW - Cross-Sectional Studies

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Knee Joint

KW - Knee Prosthesis

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Patient Satisfaction

KW - Prosthesis Design

KW - Recovery of Function

KW - Surveys and Questionnaires

KW - Treatment Outcome

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3

DO - 10.1186/s12891-016-1001-3

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27036995

VL - 17

JO - B M C Musculoskeletal Disorders

JF - B M C Musculoskeletal Disorders

SN - 1471-2474

IS - 141

M1 - 141

ER -

ID: 174210196