Cell-free DNA promoter hypermethylation as a diagnostic marker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma – An external validation study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Stine D. Henriksen
  • Benjamin E. Stubbe
  • Poul H. Madsen
  • Johansen, Julia Sidenius
  • Benny V. Jensen
  • Carsten P. Hansen
  • Martin N. Johansen
  • Inge S. Pedersen
  • Henrik Krarup
  • Ole Thorlacius-Ussing

Background: We recently identified a diagnostic prediction model based on promoter hypermethylation of eight selected genes in plasma cell-free (cf) DNA, which showed promising results as a diagnostic biomarker for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The aim of the present study was to validate this biomarker profile in an external patient cohort and examine any additional effect of serum CA 19-9. Methods: Patients with PDAC (n = 346, stage I-IV) and chronic pancreatitis (n = 25) were included. Methylation-specific PCR of a 28-gene panel was performed on serum cfDNA samples. The previously developed diagnostic prediction model (age>65 years, BMP3, RASSF1A, BNC1, MESTv2, TFPI2, APC, SFRP1 and SFRP2) was validated alone and in combination with serum CA 19-9 in this external patient cohort. Results: Patients with PDAC had a higher number of hypermethylated genes (mean 8.11, 95% CI 7.70–8.52) than patients with chronic pancreatitis (mean 5.60, 95% CI 4.42–6.78, p = 0.011). Validation of the diagnostic prediction model yielded an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.69–0.84). The combination of serum CA 19-9 and our test had an AUC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.89–0.96) in the primary study and 0.85 (95% CI 0.79–0.91) in the validation study. Conclusion: In this validation study, PDAC was associated with a higher number of hypermethylated genes in serum cfDNA than chronic pancreatitis. Our diagnostic test was superior to the predictive value of serum CA 19-9 alone in both the primary and the validation study. The combination of our test with CA 19-9 may serve as a clinically useful diagnostic biomarker for PDAC.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPancreatology
Vol/bind21
Udgave nummer6
Sider (fra-til)1081-1091
ISSN1424-3903
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Also, we thank the private foundations that supported the study: the Medical Advancement of Science Foundation , Speciallæge Heinrick Koops Foundation , Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation , Marie Pedersen and Jensine Heibergs Foundation , Beckett Foundation , Blegdalens Foundation and the Resident Foundation at Aalborg University Hospital . The foundations had no influence on the study design, data analysis, data interpretation or manuscript writing.

Funding Information:
We would like to express our gratitude to all the patients who participated in the study. Also, we thank the private foundations that supported the study: the Medical Advancement of Science Foundation, Speciall?ge Heinrick Koops Foundation, Aase and Ejnar Danielsens Foundation, Marie Pedersen and Jensine Heibergs Foundation, Beckett Foundation, Blegdalens Foundation and the Resident Foundation at Aalborg University Hospital. The foundations had no influence on the study design, data analysis, data interpretation or manuscript writing. Likewise we express our gratitude to: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Aalborg University Hospital and Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors

ID: 272237328