Diabetes status-related differences in risk factors and mediators of heart failure in the general population: results from the MORGAM/BiomarCaRE consortium

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Matti A. Vuori
  • Jaakko Reinikainen
  • Stefan Söderberg
  • Ellinor Bergdahl
  • Pekka Jousilahti
  • Hugh Tunstall-Pedoe
  • Tanja Zeller
  • Dirk Westermann
  • Susana Sans
  • Linneberg, Allan René
  • Licia Iacoviello
  • Simona Costanzo
  • Veikko Salomaa
  • Stefan Blankenberg
  • Kari Kuulasmaa
  • Teemu J. Niiranen

Background: The risk of heart failure among diabetic individuals is high, even under tight glycemic control. The correlates and mediators of heart failure risk in individuals with diabetes need more elucidation in large population-based cohorts with long follow-up times and a wide panel of biologically relevant biomarkers. Methods: In a population-based sample of 3834 diabetic and 90,177 non-diabetic individuals, proportional hazards models and mediation analysis were used to assess the relation of conventional heart failure risk factors and biomarkers with incident heart failure. Results: Over a median follow-up of 13.8 years, a total of 652 (17.0%) and 5524 (6.1%) cases of incident heart failure were observed in participants with and without diabetes, respectively. 51.4% were women and the mean age at baseline was 48.7 (standard deviation [SD] 12.5) years. The multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for heart failure among diabetic individuals was 2.70 (95% confidence interval, 2.49–2.93) compared to non-diabetic participants. In the multivariable-adjusted Cox models, conventional cardiovascular disease risk factors, such as smoking (diabetes: HR 2.07 [1.59–2.69]; non-diabetes: HR 1.85 [1.68–2.02]), BMI (diabetes: HR 1.30 [1.18–1.42]; non-diabetes: HR 1.40 [1.35–1.47]), baseline myocardial infarction (diabetes: HR 2.06 [1.55–2.75]; non-diabetes: HR 2.86 [2.50–3.28]), and baseline atrial fibrillation (diabetes: HR 1.51 [0.82–2.80]; non-diabetes: HR 2.97 [2.21–4.00]) had the strongest associations with incident heart failure. In addition, biomarkers for cardiac strain (represented by nT-proBNP, diabetes: HR 1.26 [1.19–1.34]; non-diabetes: HR 1.43 [1.39–1.47]), myocardial injury (hs-TnI, diabetes: HR 1.10 [1.04–1.16]; non-diabetes: HR 1.13 [1.10–1.16]), and inflammation (hs-CRP, diabetes: HR 1.13 [1.03–1.24]; non-diabetes: HR 1.29 [1.25–1.34]) were also associated with incident heart failure. In general, all these associations were equally strong in non-diabetic and diabetic individuals. However, the strongest mediators of heart failure in diabetes were the direct effect of diabetes status itself (relative effect share 43.1% [33.9–52.3] and indirect effects (effect share 56.9% [47.7-66.1]) mediated by obesity (BMI, 13.2% [10.3–16.2]), cardiac strain/volume overload (nT-proBNP, 8.4% [-0.7–17.4]), and hyperglycemia (glucose, 12.0% [4.2–19.9]). Conclusions: The findings suggest that the main mediators of heart failure in diabetes are obesity, hyperglycemia, and cardiac strain/volume overload. Conventional cardiovascular risk factors are strongly related to incident heart failure, but these associations are not stronger in diabetic than in non-diabetic individuals. Active measurement of relevant biomarkers could potentially be used to improve prevention and prediction of heart failure in high-risk diabetic patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer195
TidsskriftCardiovascular Diabetology
Vol/bind20
Antal sider14
ISSN1475-2840
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The MORGAM Project has received funding from EU projects MORGAM (Biomed, BMH4-CT98-3183), GenomEUtwin (FP5, QLG2-CT-2002-01254), ENGAGE (FP7, HEALTH-F4-2007–-201413), CHANCES (FP7, HEALTH-F3-2010-242244), BiomarCaRE (FP7, HEALTH-F2-2011-278913), euCanSHare (Horizon 2020, No. 825903) and AFFECT-EU (Horizon 2020, No. 847770); and Medical Research Council, London (G0601463, No. 80983: Biomarkers in the MORGAM Populations). This has supported central coordination, workshops and part of the activities of the MORGAM Data Centre, the MORGAM Laboratories and the MORGAM Participating Centres.

Funding Information:
The SHHEC study was funded by the Scottish Health Department Chief Scientist Organization, the British Heart Foundation and the FP Fleming Trust. The Danish MONICA studies were funded by the Danish National Medical Research Council, Copenhagen County, and the Danish Heart Foundation. The Northern Sweden MONICA study was founded by the county councils in Norr- and Västerbotten and by Umeå University, The FINRISK Study core data collection was funded by the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, The enrolment phase of the Moli-sani study was supported by research grants from Pfizer Foundation (Rome, Italy), the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MIUR, Rome, Italy)–Programma Triennale di Ricerca, Decreto n.1588 and Instrumentation Laboratory (Milan, Italy). The follow-up phase of the Moli-sani Study (assessment of incident cases) was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health (PI GdG, CoPI SC; grant n. RF-2018-12367074).

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Juho Vainio Foundation, State research aid of Finland and Turku University Foundation (M.V.), the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, the Emil Aaltonen Foundation (T.N.), and Academy of Finland, Grant no. 321351 (T.N.). V.S. was supported by the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).

ID: 281160028