Impact of para aortic lymph node removal on survival following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Impact of para aortic lymph node removal on survival following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. / Sillesen, Martin; Hansen, Carsten Palnæs; Burgdorf, Stefan Kobbelgaard; Dencker, Emilie Even; Krohn, Paul Suno; Gisela Kollbeck, Sophie Louise; Stender, Mogens Tornby; Storkholm, Jan Henrik.
I: BMC Surgery, Bind 23, Nr. 1, 214, 2023.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of para aortic lymph node removal on survival following resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma
AU - Sillesen, Martin
AU - Hansen, Carsten Palnæs
AU - Burgdorf, Stefan Kobbelgaard
AU - Dencker, Emilie Even
AU - Krohn, Paul Suno
AU - Gisela Kollbeck, Sophie Louise
AU - Stender, Mogens Tornby
AU - Storkholm, Jan Henrik
N1 - Funding Information: Open access funding provided by Royal Library, Copenhagen University Library. The study was funded by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (#NNF19OC0055183) to MS. Publisher Copyright: © 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: For PDAC patients undergoing resection, it remains unclear whether metastases to the paraaortic lymph nodes (PALN+) have any prognostic significance and whether metastases should lead to the operation not being carried out. Our hypothesis is that PALN + status would be associated with short overall survival (OS) compared with PALN-, but longer OS compared with patients undergoing surgical exploration only (EXP). Methods: Patients with registered PALN removal from the nationwide Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database (DPCD) from May 1st 2011 to December 31st 2020 were assessed. A cohort of PDAC patients who only had explorative laparotomy due to non-resectable tumors were also included (EXP group). Survival analysis between groups were performed with cox-regression in a multivariate approach including relevant confounders. Results: A total of 1758 patients were assessed, including 424 (24.1%) patients who only underwent explorative surgery leaving 1334 (75.8%) patients for further assessment. Of these 158 patients (11.8%) had selective PALN removal, of whom 19 patients (12.0%) had PALN+. Survival analyses indicated that explorative surgery was associated with significantly shorter OS compared with resection and PALN + status (Hazard Ratio 2.36, p < 0.001). No difference between PALN + and PALN- status could be demonstrated in resected patients after controlling for confounders. Conclusion: PALN + status in patients undergoing resection offer improved survival compared with EXP. PALN + should not be seen as a contraindication for curative intended resection.
AB - Introduction: For PDAC patients undergoing resection, it remains unclear whether metastases to the paraaortic lymph nodes (PALN+) have any prognostic significance and whether metastases should lead to the operation not being carried out. Our hypothesis is that PALN + status would be associated with short overall survival (OS) compared with PALN-, but longer OS compared with patients undergoing surgical exploration only (EXP). Methods: Patients with registered PALN removal from the nationwide Danish Pancreatic Cancer Database (DPCD) from May 1st 2011 to December 31st 2020 were assessed. A cohort of PDAC patients who only had explorative laparotomy due to non-resectable tumors were also included (EXP group). Survival analysis between groups were performed with cox-regression in a multivariate approach including relevant confounders. Results: A total of 1758 patients were assessed, including 424 (24.1%) patients who only underwent explorative surgery leaving 1334 (75.8%) patients for further assessment. Of these 158 patients (11.8%) had selective PALN removal, of whom 19 patients (12.0%) had PALN+. Survival analyses indicated that explorative surgery was associated with significantly shorter OS compared with resection and PALN + status (Hazard Ratio 2.36, p < 0.001). No difference between PALN + and PALN- status could be demonstrated in resected patients after controlling for confounders. Conclusion: PALN + status in patients undergoing resection offer improved survival compared with EXP. PALN + should not be seen as a contraindication for curative intended resection.
KW - Long term survival
KW - Lymph station 16
KW - Pancreatic cancer
U2 - 10.1186/s12893-023-02123-2
DO - 10.1186/s12893-023-02123-2
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37528360
AN - SCOPUS:85166071336
VL - 23
JO - BMC Surgery
JF - BMC Surgery
SN - 1471-2482
IS - 1
M1 - 214
ER -
ID: 372809339