Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials for mixed and non-IgE-mediated food allergy: Systematic review

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 2,1 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Core Outcome Measures for Food Allergy (COMFA) consortium
Background
Mixed and non-IgE-mediated food allergy is a subset of immune-mediated adverse food reactions that can impose a major burden on the quality of life of affected patients and their families. Clinical trials to study these diseases are reliant upon consistent and valid outcome measures that are relevant to both patients and clinicians, but the degree to which such stringent outcome reporting takes place is poorly studied.

Objective
As part of the Core Outcome Measures for Food Allergy (COMFA) project, we identified outcomes reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of treatments for mixed or non-IgE-mediated food allergy.

Design
In this systematic review, we searched the Ovid, MEDLINE and Embase databases for RCTs in children or adults investigating treatments for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis, food protein-induced enteropathy and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders including eosinophilic esophagitis [EoE], eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic colitis published until 14 October 2022.

Results
Twenty-six eligible studies were identified, with 23 focused on EoE (88%). Most interventions were corticosteroids or monoclonal antibodies. All EoE studies assessed patient-reported dysphagia, usually using a non-validated questionnaire. Twenty-two of 23 EoE studies used peak tissue eosinophil count as the primary outcome, usually using a non-validated assessment method, and other immunological markers were only exploratory. Thirteen (57%) EoE studies reported endoscopic outcomes of which six used a validated scoring tool recently recommended as a core outcome for EoE trials. Funding source was not obviously associated with likelihood of an RCT reporting mechanistic versus patient-reported outcomes. Only 3 (12%) RCTs concerned forms of food allergy other than EoE, and they reported on fecal immunological markers and patient-reported outcomes.

Conclusions
Outcomes measured in clinical trials of EoE and non-IgE-mediated food allergy are heterogeneous and largely non-validated. Core outcomes for EoE have been developed and need to be used in future trials. For other forms of mixed or non-IgE-mediated food allergies, core outcome development is needed to support the development of effective treatments.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical and Experimental Allergy
Vol/bind53
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)526-535
Antal sider10
ISSN0954-7894
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
: is a consultant for Aquestive; is a member of physician/medical advisory boards for DBV Technologies, Sanofi/Regeneron, Nutricia, Novartis, Aquestive, Allergy Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, ALK‐Abello and Prota, with all activity unrelated to vaccines/vaccine development or COVID‐19 treatment; is an unpaid member of the scientific advisory council for the National Peanut Board and medical advisory board of the International Food Protein Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Association; is a member of the Brighton Collaboration Criteria Vaccine Anaphylaxis 2.0 working group; is the senior associate editor for the ; and is member of the Joint Taskforce on Allergy Practice Parameters. He has received honorarium for lectures from ImSci, MedLearningGroup, RMEI Medical Education, and multiple state/local allergy societies. He received past research support ending in 2020 from the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (K08‐HS024599). : is a consultant for Mabylon AG, Switzerland. Has received research grants from European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID), Promedica Stiftung, Switzerland, Novartis Freenovation, Switzerland, and EoE stiftung Switzerland. : is a consultant for ALK (ending in 2022). Has received research support from Sanofi Genzyme. Matthew Greenhawt Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Willem van de Veen Ann‐Marie M Schoos

Funding Information:
This work was supported by grant 1515/M of the Promedica Stiftung Chur, Switzerland. This work was supported by grant CA18227 from the European Union COST programme https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA18227/ .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Clinical & Experimental Allergy published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

ID: 363057610