The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. / COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group; The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group.

I: Thrombosis Research, Bind 237, 2024, s. 46-51.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group & The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group 2024, 'The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme', Thrombosis Research, bind 237, s. 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016

APA

COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group, & The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group (2024). The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. Thrombosis Research, 237, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016

Vancouver

COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group, The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. Thrombosis Research. 2024;237:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016

Author

COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group ; The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group. / The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme. I: Thrombosis Research. 2024 ; Bind 237. s. 46-51.

Bibtex

@article{f67426fcffff4707b98b756e5c8553a4,
title = "The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme",
abstract = "Aim: Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion. Method: Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively. Results: Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2. Conclusion: The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.",
author = "Baastrup, {Niklas Nygaard} and Buch, {Astrid Kerstine} and Gundestrup, {Anders Kierkegaard} and Olsen, {Anna Sofie Friis} and Jakob Kleif and Issam Al-Najami and Ulrik Deding and Bertelsen, {Claus Anders} and {COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group} and {The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2024 The Authors",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016",
language = "English",
volume = "237",
pages = "46--51",
journal = "Thrombosis Research",
issn = "0049-3848",
publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The incidence of venous thromboembolism after curative colon cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme

AU - Baastrup, Niklas Nygaard

AU - Buch, Astrid Kerstine

AU - Gundestrup, Anders Kierkegaard

AU - Olsen, Anna Sofie Friis

AU - Kleif, Jakob

AU - Al-Najami, Issam

AU - Deding, Ulrik

AU - Bertelsen, Claus Anders

AU - COMES II - Copenhagen cOmplete Mesocolic Excision Study II study group

AU - The Danish Colorectal Cancer Group

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 The Authors

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - Aim: Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion. Method: Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively. Results: Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2. Conclusion: The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.

AB - Aim: Based on three randomised controlled trials performed more than a decade ago, several national guidelines recommend prolonged venous thromboprophylaxis for 28 days following elective surgery for colon cancer. None of these studies were conducted within enhanced recovery after surgery setting. Newer studies indicate that prolonged prophylaxis might not be necessary with enhanced recovery after surgery. We aimed to provide further evidence to this unresolved discussion. Method: Retrospective study of patients undergoing elective surgery for colon cancer stage I-III with enhanced recovery after surgery in the Capital Region of Denmark from 2014 to 2017. Patients were excluded if discharged on postoperative day 28 or later, dying before discharge, undergoing concomitant rectum resection, or discharged with vitamin K antagonists, direct-oral anticoagulants, or low molecular weight heparin treatment. All patients received only low-dose low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis during their admission. The primary endpoint was symptomatic lower limb deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism diagnosed within 60 days postoperatively. Results: Out of the included population of 1806 patients, only three experienced a symptomatic venous thromboembolic event; none was fatal. Two had pulmonary embolism associated with pneumonia, while one patient was diagnosed with lower limb deep venous thrombosis at postoperative day 15 after an uncomplicated course with first discharge at postoperative day 2. Conclusion: The risk of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after elective surgery for colon cancer with enhanced recovery after surgery seems negligible even without prolonged prophylaxis. The current guidelines need to be reconsidered.

U2 - 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016

DO - 10.1016/j.thromres.2024.03.016

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 38547694

AN - SCOPUS:85189018753

VL - 237

SP - 46

EP - 51

JO - Thrombosis Research

JF - Thrombosis Research

SN - 0049-3848

ER -

ID: 387871880