Use of common analgesic medications and ovarian cancer survival: results from a pooled analysis in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftLetterForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Suzanne C Dixon
  • Christina M Nagle
  • Nicolas Wentzensen
  • Britton Trabert
  • Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel
  • Joellen M Schildkraut
  • Kirsten B Moysich
  • Anna deFazio
  • Harvey A Risch
  • Mary Anne Rossing
  • Jennifer A Doherty
  • Kristine G Wicklund
  • Marc T Goodman
  • Francesmary Modugno
  • Roberta B Ness
  • Robert P Edwards
  • Allan Jensen
  • Kjær, Susanne Krüger
  • Høgdall, Estrid Vilma Solyom
  • Andrew Berchuck
  • Daniel W Cramer
  • Kathryn L Terry
  • Elizabeth M Poole
  • Elisa V Bandera
  • Lisa E Paddock
  • Hoda Anton-Culver
  • Argyrios Ziogas
  • Usha Menon
  • Simon A Gayther
  • Susan J Ramus
  • Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
  • Celeste Leigh Pearce
  • Anna H Wu
  • Malcolm C Pike
  • Penelope M Webb
  • Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been associated with improved survival in some cancers, but evidence for ovarian cancer is limited.

METHODS: Pooling individual-level data from 12 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies, we evaluated the association between self-reported, pre-diagnosis use of common analgesics and overall/progression-free/disease-specific survival among 7694 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (4273 deaths).

RESULTS: Regular analgesic use (at least once per week) was not associated with overall survival (pooled hazard ratios, pHRs (95% confidence intervals): aspirin 0.96 (0.88-1.04); non-aspirin NSAIDs 0.97 (0.89-1.05); acetaminophen 1.01 (0.93-1.10)), nor with progression-free/disease-specific survival. There was however a survival advantage for users of any NSAIDs in studies clearly defining non-use as less than once per week (pHR=0.89 (0.82-0.98)).

CONCLUSIONS: Although this study did not show a clear association between analgesic use and ovarian cancer survival, further investigation with clearer definitions of use and information about post-diagnosis use is warranted.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftB J C
Vol/bind116
Udgave nummer9
Sider (fra-til)1223-1228
ISSN0007-0920
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2017

Antal downloads er baseret på statistik fra Google Scholar og www.ku.dk


Ingen data tilgængelig

ID: 196043196