Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia: One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia : One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study. / Nytrøen, Kari; Rolid, Katrine; Andreassen, Arne Kristian; Yardley, Marianne; Gude, Einar; Dahle, Dag Olav; Bjørkelund, Elisabeth; Relbo Authen, Anne; Grov, Ingelin; Philip Wigh, Julia; Have Dall, Christian; Gustafsson, Finn; Karason, Kristjan; Gullestad, Lars.

I: Circulation, Bind 139, Nr. 19, 2019, s. 2198-2211.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nytrøen, K, Rolid, K, Andreassen, AK, Yardley, M, Gude, E, Dahle, DO, Bjørkelund, E, Relbo Authen, A, Grov, I, Philip Wigh, J, Have Dall, C, Gustafsson, F, Karason, K & Gullestad, L 2019, 'Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia: One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study', Circulation, bind 139, nr. 19, s. 2198-2211. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747

APA

Nytrøen, K., Rolid, K., Andreassen, A. K., Yardley, M., Gude, E., Dahle, D. O., Bjørkelund, E., Relbo Authen, A., Grov, I., Philip Wigh, J., Have Dall, C., Gustafsson, F., Karason, K., & Gullestad, L. (2019). Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia: One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study. Circulation, 139(19), 2198-2211. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747

Vancouver

Nytrøen K, Rolid K, Andreassen AK, Yardley M, Gude E, Dahle DO o.a. Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia: One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study. Circulation. 2019;139(19):2198-2211. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747

Author

Nytrøen, Kari ; Rolid, Katrine ; Andreassen, Arne Kristian ; Yardley, Marianne ; Gude, Einar ; Dahle, Dag Olav ; Bjørkelund, Elisabeth ; Relbo Authen, Anne ; Grov, Ingelin ; Philip Wigh, Julia ; Have Dall, Christian ; Gustafsson, Finn ; Karason, Kristjan ; Gullestad, Lars. / Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia : One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study. I: Circulation. 2019 ; Bind 139, Nr. 19. s. 2198-2211.

Bibtex

@article{a31b703bc3204b0aab7176130b16eb55,
title = "Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia: One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study",
abstract = "Background: There is no consensus on how, when, or at what intensity exercise should be performed after heart transplantation (HTx). We have recently shown that high-intensity interval training (HIT) is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the maintenance state after HTx, but studies have not investigated HIT effects in the de novo HTx state. We hypothesized that HIT could be introduced early after HTx and that it could lead to clinically meaningful increases in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 81 patients a mean of 11 weeks (range, 7-16 weeks) after an HTx. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9 months of either HIT (4×4-minute intervals at 85%-95% of peak effort) or moderate-intensity continuous training (60%-80% of peak effort). The primary outcome was the effect of HIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training on the change in aerobic exercise capacity, assessed as the peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak). Secondary outcomes included tolerability, safety, adverse events, isokinetic muscular strength, body composition, health-related quality of life, left ventricular function, hemodynamics, endothelial function, and biomarkers. Results: From baseline to follow-up, 96% of patients completed the study. There were no serious exercise-related adverse events. The population comprised 73% men, and the mean±SD age was 49±13 years. At the 1-year follow-up, the HIT group demonstrated greater improvements than the moderate-intensity continuous training group; the groups showed significantly different changes in the Vo2peak (mean difference between groups, 1.8 mL·kg-1·min-1), the anaerobic threshold (0.28 L/min), the peak expiratory flow (11%), and the extensor muscle exercise capacity (464 J). The 1.8-mL·kg-1·min-1 difference was equal to ≈0.5 metabolic equivalents, which is regarded as clinically meaningful and relevant. Health-related quality of life was similar between the groups, as indicated by results from the Short Form-36 (version 2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a visual analog scale. Conclusions: We demonstrated that HIT was a safe, efficient exercise method in de novo HTx recipients. HIT, compared with moderate-intensity continuous training, resulted in a clinically significantly greater change in exercise capacity based on the Vo2peak values (25% versus 15%), anaerobic threshold, peak expiratory flow, and muscular exercise capacity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01796379.",
keywords = "exercise test, health-related quality of life, heart transplantation, high-intensity interval training, muscle strength, peak oxygen consumption, safety",
author = "Kari Nytr{\o}en and Katrine Rolid and Andreassen, {Arne Kristian} and Marianne Yardley and Einar Gude and Dahle, {Dag Olav} and Elisabeth Bj{\o}rkelund and {Relbo Authen}, Anne and Ingelin Grov and {Philip Wigh}, Julia and {Have Dall}, Christian and Finn Gustafsson and Kristjan Karason and Lars Gullestad",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "2198--2211",
journal = "Circulation",
issn = "0009-7322",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "19",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training in De Novo Heart Transplant Recipients in Scandinavia

T2 - One-Year Follow-Up of the HITTS Randomized, Controlled Study

AU - Nytrøen, Kari

AU - Rolid, Katrine

AU - Andreassen, Arne Kristian

AU - Yardley, Marianne

AU - Gude, Einar

AU - Dahle, Dag Olav

AU - Bjørkelund, Elisabeth

AU - Relbo Authen, Anne

AU - Grov, Ingelin

AU - Philip Wigh, Julia

AU - Have Dall, Christian

AU - Gustafsson, Finn

AU - Karason, Kristjan

AU - Gullestad, Lars

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: There is no consensus on how, when, or at what intensity exercise should be performed after heart transplantation (HTx). We have recently shown that high-intensity interval training (HIT) is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the maintenance state after HTx, but studies have not investigated HIT effects in the de novo HTx state. We hypothesized that HIT could be introduced early after HTx and that it could lead to clinically meaningful increases in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 81 patients a mean of 11 weeks (range, 7-16 weeks) after an HTx. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9 months of either HIT (4×4-minute intervals at 85%-95% of peak effort) or moderate-intensity continuous training (60%-80% of peak effort). The primary outcome was the effect of HIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training on the change in aerobic exercise capacity, assessed as the peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak). Secondary outcomes included tolerability, safety, adverse events, isokinetic muscular strength, body composition, health-related quality of life, left ventricular function, hemodynamics, endothelial function, and biomarkers. Results: From baseline to follow-up, 96% of patients completed the study. There were no serious exercise-related adverse events. The population comprised 73% men, and the mean±SD age was 49±13 years. At the 1-year follow-up, the HIT group demonstrated greater improvements than the moderate-intensity continuous training group; the groups showed significantly different changes in the Vo2peak (mean difference between groups, 1.8 mL·kg-1·min-1), the anaerobic threshold (0.28 L/min), the peak expiratory flow (11%), and the extensor muscle exercise capacity (464 J). The 1.8-mL·kg-1·min-1 difference was equal to ≈0.5 metabolic equivalents, which is regarded as clinically meaningful and relevant. Health-related quality of life was similar between the groups, as indicated by results from the Short Form-36 (version 2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a visual analog scale. Conclusions: We demonstrated that HIT was a safe, efficient exercise method in de novo HTx recipients. HIT, compared with moderate-intensity continuous training, resulted in a clinically significantly greater change in exercise capacity based on the Vo2peak values (25% versus 15%), anaerobic threshold, peak expiratory flow, and muscular exercise capacity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01796379.

AB - Background: There is no consensus on how, when, or at what intensity exercise should be performed after heart transplantation (HTx). We have recently shown that high-intensity interval training (HIT) is safe, well tolerated, and efficacious in the maintenance state after HTx, but studies have not investigated HIT effects in the de novo HTx state. We hypothesized that HIT could be introduced early after HTx and that it could lead to clinically meaningful increases in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 81 patients a mean of 11 weeks (range, 7-16 weeks) after an HTx. Patients were randomized 1:1 to 9 months of either HIT (4×4-minute intervals at 85%-95% of peak effort) or moderate-intensity continuous training (60%-80% of peak effort). The primary outcome was the effect of HIT versus moderate-intensity continuous training on the change in aerobic exercise capacity, assessed as the peak oxygen consumption (Vo2peak). Secondary outcomes included tolerability, safety, adverse events, isokinetic muscular strength, body composition, health-related quality of life, left ventricular function, hemodynamics, endothelial function, and biomarkers. Results: From baseline to follow-up, 96% of patients completed the study. There were no serious exercise-related adverse events. The population comprised 73% men, and the mean±SD age was 49±13 years. At the 1-year follow-up, the HIT group demonstrated greater improvements than the moderate-intensity continuous training group; the groups showed significantly different changes in the Vo2peak (mean difference between groups, 1.8 mL·kg-1·min-1), the anaerobic threshold (0.28 L/min), the peak expiratory flow (11%), and the extensor muscle exercise capacity (464 J). The 1.8-mL·kg-1·min-1 difference was equal to ≈0.5 metabolic equivalents, which is regarded as clinically meaningful and relevant. Health-related quality of life was similar between the groups, as indicated by results from the Short Form-36 (version 2), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and a visual analog scale. Conclusions: We demonstrated that HIT was a safe, efficient exercise method in de novo HTx recipients. HIT, compared with moderate-intensity continuous training, resulted in a clinically significantly greater change in exercise capacity based on the Vo2peak values (25% versus 15%), anaerobic threshold, peak expiratory flow, and muscular exercise capacity. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT01796379.

KW - exercise test

KW - health-related quality of life

KW - heart transplantation

KW - high-intensity interval training

KW - muscle strength

KW - peak oxygen consumption

KW - safety

U2 - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747

DO - 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036747

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30773030

AN - SCOPUS:85065650972

VL - 139

SP - 2198

EP - 2211

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

SN - 0009-7322

IS - 19

ER -

ID: 236662656