Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study. / Agerskov, Marianne; Sørensen, Henrik; Højlund, Jakob; Secher, Niels H; Foss, Nicolai Bang.
I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Bind 66, Nr. 6, 2022, s. 660-673.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study
AU - Agerskov, Marianne
AU - Sørensen, Henrik
AU - Højlund, Jakob
AU - Secher, Niels H
AU - Foss, Nicolai Bang
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Background: Preoperative resuscitation strategies in patients with hip fracture (HF) are lacking. We aimed to investigate fluid-responsiveness, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and blood volume (BV)-status in patients with HF undergoing resuscitation in the preoperative phase. Methods: In a prospective observational study, we evaluated preoperative fluid-responsiveness, indices of perfusion and BV before and after lumbar epidural analgesia in 50 patients with HF shortly after admittance. Results: Initially, 18 (36%) patients were fluid-responsive (≥10% increased SV in response to 250 ml fluid bolus) and 13 (26%) presented hypovolaemia (deviation of measured BV from estimated BV ≤ 0.9). According to fluid-responsiveness, no difference in absolute values of cardiac index (CI) (2.7 L [2.1–3.3] vs. 2.8 L [2.3–3.4], p =.5) was seen, but cardiac output (CO) rose significantly in the hypovolaemic patients: 9% [5–18] vs. 1% [−3–7], p =.004. After epidural analgesia, 26 (52%) patients were again fluid-responsive and 15 (30%) were hypovolaemic. CI was now significantly lower in fluid-responsive patients (2.2 L [1.7–2.7] vs. 2.9 L [2.3–3.5], p =.001). Prior to epidural analgesia, no significant trend towards hypovolaemic patients having lower indices of perfusion was seen. After epidural analgesia, more patients with hypovolaemia presented with PPI≤1.5 (8 (53%) vs. 3 (9%), p =.001) and absolute values of PPI were also significantly lower if IBV was low (1.4 [0.9–3.2] vs. 3.2 [2.4–4.8], p =.01). PPI correlated with hypovolaemia after epidural analgesia (rho 0.4 [0.1–0.7], p =.007). Conclusions: Preoperative fluid-responsivity in HF patients might be attributable to elements of hypovolaemia and sympathetic compensatory ability conjointly, confounding the use of SV-guided resuscitation. PPI could be associated with BV, which may support clinicians during perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.
AB - Background: Preoperative resuscitation strategies in patients with hip fracture (HF) are lacking. We aimed to investigate fluid-responsiveness, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and blood volume (BV)-status in patients with HF undergoing resuscitation in the preoperative phase. Methods: In a prospective observational study, we evaluated preoperative fluid-responsiveness, indices of perfusion and BV before and after lumbar epidural analgesia in 50 patients with HF shortly after admittance. Results: Initially, 18 (36%) patients were fluid-responsive (≥10% increased SV in response to 250 ml fluid bolus) and 13 (26%) presented hypovolaemia (deviation of measured BV from estimated BV ≤ 0.9). According to fluid-responsiveness, no difference in absolute values of cardiac index (CI) (2.7 L [2.1–3.3] vs. 2.8 L [2.3–3.4], p =.5) was seen, but cardiac output (CO) rose significantly in the hypovolaemic patients: 9% [5–18] vs. 1% [−3–7], p =.004. After epidural analgesia, 26 (52%) patients were again fluid-responsive and 15 (30%) were hypovolaemic. CI was now significantly lower in fluid-responsive patients (2.2 L [1.7–2.7] vs. 2.9 L [2.3–3.5], p =.001). Prior to epidural analgesia, no significant trend towards hypovolaemic patients having lower indices of perfusion was seen. After epidural analgesia, more patients with hypovolaemia presented with PPI≤1.5 (8 (53%) vs. 3 (9%), p =.001) and absolute values of PPI were also significantly lower if IBV was low (1.4 [0.9–3.2] vs. 3.2 [2.4–4.8], p =.01). PPI correlated with hypovolaemia after epidural analgesia (rho 0.4 [0.1–0.7], p =.007). Conclusions: Preoperative fluid-responsivity in HF patients might be attributable to elements of hypovolaemia and sympathetic compensatory ability conjointly, confounding the use of SV-guided resuscitation. PPI could be associated with BV, which may support clinicians during perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.
KW - Blood volume
KW - Haemodynamic optimisation
KW - Hip fracture
KW - Perfusion index
KW - Peripheral
KW - Preload responsiveness
U2 - 10.1111/aas.14070
DO - 10.1111/aas.14070
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 35396854
AN - SCOPUS:85128310821
VL - 66
SP - 660
EP - 673
JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-5172
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 305794986