Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study. / Agerskov, Marianne; Sørensen, Henrik; Højlund, Jakob; Secher, Niels H; Foss, Nicolai Bang.

I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, Bind 66, Nr. 6, 2022, s. 660-673.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Agerskov, M, Sørensen, H, Højlund, J, Secher, NH & Foss, NB 2022, 'Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study', Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, bind 66, nr. 6, s. 660-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14070

APA

Agerskov, M., Sørensen, H., Højlund, J., Secher, N. H., & Foss, N. B. (2022). Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 66(6), 660-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14070

Vancouver

Agerskov M, Sørensen H, Højlund J, Secher NH, Foss NB. Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2022;66(6):660-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14070

Author

Agerskov, Marianne ; Sørensen, Henrik ; Højlund, Jakob ; Secher, Niels H ; Foss, Nicolai Bang. / Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study. I: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2022 ; Bind 66, Nr. 6. s. 660-673.

Bibtex

@article{7f71bc166094453f8a4896e77af3f7c8,
title = "Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study",
abstract = "Background: Preoperative resuscitation strategies in patients with hip fracture (HF) are lacking. We aimed to investigate fluid-responsiveness, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and blood volume (BV)-status in patients with HF undergoing resuscitation in the preoperative phase. Methods: In a prospective observational study, we evaluated preoperative fluid-responsiveness, indices of perfusion and BV before and after lumbar epidural analgesia in 50 patients with HF shortly after admittance. Results: Initially, 18 (36%) patients were fluid-responsive (≥10% increased SV in response to 250 ml fluid bolus) and 13 (26%) presented hypovolaemia (deviation of measured BV from estimated BV ≤ 0.9). According to fluid-responsiveness, no difference in absolute values of cardiac index (CI) (2.7 L [2.1–3.3] vs. 2.8 L [2.3–3.4], p =.5) was seen, but cardiac output (CO) rose significantly in the hypovolaemic patients: 9% [5–18] vs. 1% [−3–7], p =.004. After epidural analgesia, 26 (52%) patients were again fluid-responsive and 15 (30%) were hypovolaemic. CI was now significantly lower in fluid-responsive patients (2.2 L [1.7–2.7] vs. 2.9 L [2.3–3.5], p =.001). Prior to epidural analgesia, no significant trend towards hypovolaemic patients having lower indices of perfusion was seen. After epidural analgesia, more patients with hypovolaemia presented with PPI≤1.5 (8 (53%) vs. 3 (9%), p =.001) and absolute values of PPI were also significantly lower if IBV was low (1.4 [0.9–3.2] vs. 3.2 [2.4–4.8], p =.01). PPI correlated with hypovolaemia after epidural analgesia (rho 0.4 [0.1–0.7], p =.007). Conclusions: Preoperative fluid-responsivity in HF patients might be attributable to elements of hypovolaemia and sympathetic compensatory ability conjointly, confounding the use of SV-guided resuscitation. PPI could be associated with BV, which may support clinicians during perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.",
keywords = "Blood volume, Haemodynamic optimisation, Hip fracture, Perfusion index, Peripheral, Preload responsiveness",
author = "Marianne Agerskov and Henrik S{\o}rensen and Jakob H{\o}jlund and Secher, {Niels H} and Foss, {Nicolai Bang}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/aas.14070",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "660--673",
journal = "Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-5172",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fluid-responsiveness, blood volume and perfusion in preoperative haemodynamic optimisation of hip fracture patients; a prospective observational study

AU - Agerskov, Marianne

AU - Sørensen, Henrik

AU - Højlund, Jakob

AU - Secher, Niels H

AU - Foss, Nicolai Bang

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Preoperative resuscitation strategies in patients with hip fracture (HF) are lacking. We aimed to investigate fluid-responsiveness, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and blood volume (BV)-status in patients with HF undergoing resuscitation in the preoperative phase. Methods: In a prospective observational study, we evaluated preoperative fluid-responsiveness, indices of perfusion and BV before and after lumbar epidural analgesia in 50 patients with HF shortly after admittance. Results: Initially, 18 (36%) patients were fluid-responsive (≥10% increased SV in response to 250 ml fluid bolus) and 13 (26%) presented hypovolaemia (deviation of measured BV from estimated BV ≤ 0.9). According to fluid-responsiveness, no difference in absolute values of cardiac index (CI) (2.7 L [2.1–3.3] vs. 2.8 L [2.3–3.4], p =.5) was seen, but cardiac output (CO) rose significantly in the hypovolaemic patients: 9% [5–18] vs. 1% [−3–7], p =.004. After epidural analgesia, 26 (52%) patients were again fluid-responsive and 15 (30%) were hypovolaemic. CI was now significantly lower in fluid-responsive patients (2.2 L [1.7–2.7] vs. 2.9 L [2.3–3.5], p =.001). Prior to epidural analgesia, no significant trend towards hypovolaemic patients having lower indices of perfusion was seen. After epidural analgesia, more patients with hypovolaemia presented with PPI≤1.5 (8 (53%) vs. 3 (9%), p =.001) and absolute values of PPI were also significantly lower if IBV was low (1.4 [0.9–3.2] vs. 3.2 [2.4–4.8], p =.01). PPI correlated with hypovolaemia after epidural analgesia (rho 0.4 [0.1–0.7], p =.007). Conclusions: Preoperative fluid-responsivity in HF patients might be attributable to elements of hypovolaemia and sympathetic compensatory ability conjointly, confounding the use of SV-guided resuscitation. PPI could be associated with BV, which may support clinicians during perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.

AB - Background: Preoperative resuscitation strategies in patients with hip fracture (HF) are lacking. We aimed to investigate fluid-responsiveness, peripheral perfusion index (PPI) and blood volume (BV)-status in patients with HF undergoing resuscitation in the preoperative phase. Methods: In a prospective observational study, we evaluated preoperative fluid-responsiveness, indices of perfusion and BV before and after lumbar epidural analgesia in 50 patients with HF shortly after admittance. Results: Initially, 18 (36%) patients were fluid-responsive (≥10% increased SV in response to 250 ml fluid bolus) and 13 (26%) presented hypovolaemia (deviation of measured BV from estimated BV ≤ 0.9). According to fluid-responsiveness, no difference in absolute values of cardiac index (CI) (2.7 L [2.1–3.3] vs. 2.8 L [2.3–3.4], p =.5) was seen, but cardiac output (CO) rose significantly in the hypovolaemic patients: 9% [5–18] vs. 1% [−3–7], p =.004. After epidural analgesia, 26 (52%) patients were again fluid-responsive and 15 (30%) were hypovolaemic. CI was now significantly lower in fluid-responsive patients (2.2 L [1.7–2.7] vs. 2.9 L [2.3–3.5], p =.001). Prior to epidural analgesia, no significant trend towards hypovolaemic patients having lower indices of perfusion was seen. After epidural analgesia, more patients with hypovolaemia presented with PPI≤1.5 (8 (53%) vs. 3 (9%), p =.001) and absolute values of PPI were also significantly lower if IBV was low (1.4 [0.9–3.2] vs. 3.2 [2.4–4.8], p =.01). PPI correlated with hypovolaemia after epidural analgesia (rho 0.4 [0.1–0.7], p =.007). Conclusions: Preoperative fluid-responsivity in HF patients might be attributable to elements of hypovolaemia and sympathetic compensatory ability conjointly, confounding the use of SV-guided resuscitation. PPI could be associated with BV, which may support clinicians during perioperative haemodynamic optimisation.

KW - Blood volume

KW - Haemodynamic optimisation

KW - Hip fracture

KW - Perfusion index

KW - Peripheral

KW - Preload responsiveness

U2 - 10.1111/aas.14070

DO - 10.1111/aas.14070

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35396854

AN - SCOPUS:85128310821

VL - 66

SP - 660

EP - 673

JO - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-5172

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 305794986