International comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes: an update and extension

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Accepteret manuskript, 18,4 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Regina Prigge
  • John A. McKnight
  • Sarah H. Wild
  • Aveni Haynes
  • Timothy W. Jones
  • Elizabeth A. Davis
  • Birgit Rami-Merhar
  • Maria Fritsch
  • Christine Prchla
  • Astrid Lavens
  • Kris Doggen
  • Suchsia Chao
  • Ronnie Aronson
  • Ruth Brown
  • Else H. Ibfelt
  • Robert Young
  • Justin T. Warner
  • Holy Robinson
  • Tiina Laatikainen
  • Päivi Rautiainen
  • Brigitte Delemer
  • Pierre François Souchon
  • Alpha M. Diallo
  • Reinhard W. Holl
  • Sebastian M. Schmid
  • Klemens Raile
  • Stelios Tigas
  • Alexandra Bargiota
  • Ioanna Zografou
  • Andrea O. Y. Luk
  • Juliana C. N. Chan
  • Sean F. Dinneen
  • Claire M. Buckley
  • Oratile Kgosidialwa
  • Valentino Cherubini
  • Rosaria Gesuita
  • Ieva Strele
  • Santa Pildava
  • Henk Veeze
  • Henk-Jan Aanstoot
  • Dick Mul
  • Craig Jefferies
  • John G. Cooper
  • Karianne Fjeld Løvaas
  • Tadej Battelino
  • Klemen Dovc
  • Nataša Bratina
  • Katarina Eeg-Olofsson
  • Ann-Marie Svensson
  • Soffia Gudbjornsdottir
  • Evgenia Globa
  • Nataliya Zelinska

AIMS: To update and extend a previous cross-sectional international comparison of glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes.

METHODS: Data were obtained for 520,392 children and adults with type 1 diabetes from 17 population and five clinic-based data sources in countries or regions between 2016 and 2020. Median HbA1c (IQR) and proportions of individuals with HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%), 58-74 mmol/mol (7.5-8.9%) and ≥75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) were compared between populations for individuals aged <15, 15-24 and ≥25 years. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) relative to ≥58 mmol/mol (≥7.5%), stratified and adjusted for sex, age and data source. Where possible, changes in the proportion of individuals in each HbA1c category compared to previous estimates were calculated.

RESULTS: Median HbA1c varied from 55 to 79 mmol/mol (7.2 to 9.4%) across data sources and age groups so a pooled estimate was deemed inappropriate. OR (95% CI) for HbA1c < 58 mmol/mol (<7.5%) were 0.91 (0.90-0.92) for women compared to men, 1.68 (1.65-1.71) for people aged <15 years and 0.81 (0.79-0.82) aged15-24 years compared to those aged ≥25 years. Differences between populations persisted after adjusting for sex, age and data source. In general, compared to our previous analysis, the proportion of people with an HbA1c < 58 mmol/l (<7.5%) increased and proportions of people with HbA1c ≥ 75 mmol/mol (≥9.0%) decreased.

CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic control of type 1 diabetes continues to vary substantially between age groups and data sources. While some improvement over time has been observed, glycaemic control remains sub-optimal for most people with Type 1 diabetes.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere14766
TidsskriftDiabetic Medicine
Vol/bind39
Udgave nummer5
Antal sider12
ISSN0742-3071
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

© 2021 Diabetes UK.

ID: 301081691