Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status : A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Hansen, Rebecka; Sejer, Emilie P.F.; Holm, Charlotte; Schroll, Jeppe B.
I: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Bind 102, Nr. 9, 2023, s. 1147-1158.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Review › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Iron supplements in pregnant women with normal iron status
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Hansen, Rebecka
AU - Sejer, Emilie P.F.
AU - Holm, Charlotte
AU - Schroll, Jeppe B.
N1 - Funding Information: The authors kindly thank trialists who upon request provided us additional study information, and the Copenhagen University Library for valuable input to the search strategy development. Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology (NFOG).
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. Material and methods: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non-anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full-texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. Results: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I2 = 13%; moderate-certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I2 = 58%; low-certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I2 not estimable; low-certainty evidence). Conclusions: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non-anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight.
AB - Introduction: Effects of daily iron supplementation in iron replete pregnancy are unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess benefits and harms of oral iron supplements in pregnant women without anemia and iron deficiency. Material and methods: We predefined and registered a protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42020186210) and performed the review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing daily oral iron supplementation with no iron supplements in non-anemic iron replete pregnant women. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE (by PubMed), EMBASE (by OVID), Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 2022 without language restrictions. Two authors independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB2). One author read full-texts, assessed certainty of evidence by GRADE and conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model. Primary outcomes included iron deficiency anemia, iron deficiency, hemoglobin >130 g/L, elevated iron status, small for gestational age newborns, low birthweight newborns, preterm birth, and congenital anomalies. Results: Eight RCTs (2822 women) but no observational studies were eligible for inclusion. Daily oral iron supplementation in pregnancy probably reduces iron deficiency anemia at term (risk ratio [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38–0.70; 4 RCTs, 1670 women; I2 = 13%; moderate-certainty evidence) and the incidence of low birthweight babies (RR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.13–0.68; 2 RCTs, 361 infants; I2 = 0%; moderate-certainty evidence). In addition, it may reduce iron deficiency at term (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60–0.92; 4 RCTs, 1663 women; I2 = 58%; low-certainty evidence) and the incidence of small for gestational age babies (RR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.86; 1 RCT, 213 infants; I2 not estimable; low-certainty evidence). Conclusions: Daily iron supplementation in iron replete non-anemic pregnant women probably reduces the risk of maternal iron deficiency anemia at term and low birthweight.
KW - iron
KW - iron deficiency
KW - iron replete
KW - maternal iron deficiency
KW - non-anemic
KW - pregnant
KW - review
U2 - 10.1111/aogs.14607
DO - 10.1111/aogs.14607
M3 - Review
C2 - 37403900
AN - SCOPUS:85164476218
VL - 102
SP - 1147
EP - 1158
JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
SN - 0001-6349
IS - 9
ER -
ID: 363592989