Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. / Steenholdt, Casper; Jensen, Jeppe T.; Brynskov, Jørn; Møller, Ann Merete; Limschou, Anne Christine; Konge, Lars; Vilmann, Peter.

I: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bind 20, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 559-568.e5.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Steenholdt, C, Jensen, JT, Brynskov, J, Møller, AM, Limschou, AC, Konge, L & Vilmann, P 2022, 'Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease', Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, bind 20, nr. 3, s. 559-568.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037

APA

Steenholdt, C., Jensen, J. T., Brynskov, J., Møller, A. M., Limschou, A. C., Konge, L., & Vilmann, P. (2022). Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 20(3), 559-568.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037

Vancouver

Steenholdt C, Jensen JT, Brynskov J, Møller AM, Limschou AC, Konge L o.a. Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2022;20(3):559-568.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037

Author

Steenholdt, Casper ; Jensen, Jeppe T. ; Brynskov, Jørn ; Møller, Ann Merete ; Limschou, Anne Christine ; Konge, Lars ; Vilmann, Peter. / Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. I: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2022 ; Bind 20, Nr. 3. s. 559-568.e5.

Bibtex

@article{a88d7053bca7452f94b935c1e850b1f1,
title = "Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease",
abstract = "Background & Aims: Colonoscopy is essential for optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients opt out due to unpleasantness related to this procedure. We investigated if Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation (NAPS) would improve patient satisfaction and attitude towards future colonoscopies. Methods: Randomized clinical trial of deep sedation with NAPS (n = 63) versus moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation (n = 67). To assess the primary end point of patient satisfaction at discharge, we developed a Satisfaction Questionnaire comprising 13 items each rated by a 5-point Likert scale and with higher scores reflecting more positive outcomes (13-65 points). Results: Fifty-six patients (43%) with ulcerative colitis, 48 (37%) with Crohn's disease, and 26 (20%) with high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease were included. Most (88%) had previously had a colonoscopy and pre-procedure expectations were similar between groups. Patients receiving deep sedation had significantly higher satisfaction score (mean 60.1, SD 3.4) than those receiving moderate sedation (51.2, 8.4; P < .001). This was driven especially by less pain, more amnesia, sedation more to their liking, and better experience with the current than previous sedations. Importantly, these patients significantly more often preferred the same sedation for a future colonoscopy and were also inclined to accept more frequent colonoscopies. Assistance from another colonoscopist and disruption of the procedure due to pain occurred significantly more frequent in the moderate sedation group. There were no safety signals associated with NAPS. Conclusions: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease favor deep propofol sedation over moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Availability of NAPS may facilitate patient adherence to endoscopy-based monitoring programs. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01934088.",
keywords = "Colonoscopy, IBD, Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Satisfaction",
author = "Casper Steenholdt and Jensen, {Jeppe T.} and J{\o}rn Brynskov and M{\o}ller, {Ann Merete} and Limschou, {Anne Christine} and Lars Konge and Peter Vilmann",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 AGA Institute",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "559--568.e5",
journal = "Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology",
issn = "1542-3565",
publisher = "W.B.Saunders Co.",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient Satisfaction of Propofol Versus Midazolam and Fentanyl Sedation During Colonoscopy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

AU - Steenholdt, Casper

AU - Jensen, Jeppe T.

AU - Brynskov, Jørn

AU - Møller, Ann Merete

AU - Limschou, Anne Christine

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Vilmann, Peter

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 AGA Institute

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background & Aims: Colonoscopy is essential for optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients opt out due to unpleasantness related to this procedure. We investigated if Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation (NAPS) would improve patient satisfaction and attitude towards future colonoscopies. Methods: Randomized clinical trial of deep sedation with NAPS (n = 63) versus moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation (n = 67). To assess the primary end point of patient satisfaction at discharge, we developed a Satisfaction Questionnaire comprising 13 items each rated by a 5-point Likert scale and with higher scores reflecting more positive outcomes (13-65 points). Results: Fifty-six patients (43%) with ulcerative colitis, 48 (37%) with Crohn's disease, and 26 (20%) with high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease were included. Most (88%) had previously had a colonoscopy and pre-procedure expectations were similar between groups. Patients receiving deep sedation had significantly higher satisfaction score (mean 60.1, SD 3.4) than those receiving moderate sedation (51.2, 8.4; P < .001). This was driven especially by less pain, more amnesia, sedation more to their liking, and better experience with the current than previous sedations. Importantly, these patients significantly more often preferred the same sedation for a future colonoscopy and were also inclined to accept more frequent colonoscopies. Assistance from another colonoscopist and disruption of the procedure due to pain occurred significantly more frequent in the moderate sedation group. There were no safety signals associated with NAPS. Conclusions: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease favor deep propofol sedation over moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Availability of NAPS may facilitate patient adherence to endoscopy-based monitoring programs. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01934088.

AB - Background & Aims: Colonoscopy is essential for optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease. However, many patients opt out due to unpleasantness related to this procedure. We investigated if Nurse Administered Propofol Sedation (NAPS) would improve patient satisfaction and attitude towards future colonoscopies. Methods: Randomized clinical trial of deep sedation with NAPS (n = 63) versus moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation (n = 67). To assess the primary end point of patient satisfaction at discharge, we developed a Satisfaction Questionnaire comprising 13 items each rated by a 5-point Likert scale and with higher scores reflecting more positive outcomes (13-65 points). Results: Fifty-six patients (43%) with ulcerative colitis, 48 (37%) with Crohn's disease, and 26 (20%) with high suspicion of inflammatory bowel disease were included. Most (88%) had previously had a colonoscopy and pre-procedure expectations were similar between groups. Patients receiving deep sedation had significantly higher satisfaction score (mean 60.1, SD 3.4) than those receiving moderate sedation (51.2, 8.4; P < .001). This was driven especially by less pain, more amnesia, sedation more to their liking, and better experience with the current than previous sedations. Importantly, these patients significantly more often preferred the same sedation for a future colonoscopy and were also inclined to accept more frequent colonoscopies. Assistance from another colonoscopist and disruption of the procedure due to pain occurred significantly more frequent in the moderate sedation group. There were no safety signals associated with NAPS. Conclusions: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease favor deep propofol sedation over moderate midazolam and fentanyl sedation. Availability of NAPS may facilitate patient adherence to endoscopy-based monitoring programs. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01934088.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - IBD

KW - Nurse-Administered Propofol Sedation

KW - Patient-Reported Outcomes

KW - Satisfaction

U2 - 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037

DO - 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.10.037

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33371995

AN - SCOPUS:85099243664

VL - 20

SP - 559-568.e5

JO - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

JF - Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

SN - 1542-3565

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 314146069