An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents : a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial. / Olsen, Markus Harboe; Morthorst, Britt; Pagsberg, Anne Katrine; Heinrichsen, Michella; Møhl, Bo; Rubæk, Lotte; Bjureberg, Johan; Simonsson, Olivia; Lindschou, Jane; Gluud, Christian; Jakobsen, Janus Christian.

I: Trials, Bind 22, 456, 2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Olsen, MH, Morthorst, B, Pagsberg, AK, Heinrichsen, M, Møhl, B, Rubæk, L, Bjureberg, J, Simonsson, O, Lindschou, J, Gluud, C & Jakobsen, JC 2021, 'An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial', Trials, bind 22, 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2

APA

Olsen, M. H., Morthorst, B., Pagsberg, A. K., Heinrichsen, M., Møhl, B., Rubæk, L., Bjureberg, J., Simonsson, O., Lindschou, J., Gluud, C., & Jakobsen, J. C. (2021). An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial. Trials, 22, [456]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2

Vancouver

Olsen MH, Morthorst B, Pagsberg AK, Heinrichsen M, Møhl B, Rubæk L o.a. An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial. Trials. 2021;22. 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2

Author

Olsen, Markus Harboe ; Morthorst, Britt ; Pagsberg, Anne Katrine ; Heinrichsen, Michella ; Møhl, Bo ; Rubæk, Lotte ; Bjureberg, Johan ; Simonsson, Olivia ; Lindschou, Jane ; Gluud, Christian ; Jakobsen, Janus Christian. / An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents : a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial. I: Trials. 2021 ; Bind 22.

Bibtex

@article{3d55b9df8c4e4f78b27ebd78473fa0a6,
title = "An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents: a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial",
abstract = "Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and safety of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as an add-on to treatment as usual in 13–17-year-old patients with NSSI referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Methods: The TEENS feasibility trial is a randomised clinical trial with a parallel-group design. The trial intervention is an 11-week online therapy which is tested as an add-on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual. The primary feasibility outcomes are the fraction of participants who (1) completed 12 weeks of follow-up interview or assessment, (2) consented to inclusion and randomisation out of all eligible participants, and (3) were compliant with the experimental intervention, assessed as completion of at least six out of eleven modules in the programme. Since this is a feasibility trial, we did not predefine a required sample size. The exploratory clinical outcome, the frequency of NSSI episodes, assessed using Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory – Youth version (DSHI-Y), at the end of intervention, is planned to be the future primary outcome in a larger pragmatic definitive randomised clinical trial. After completion of the feasibility trial, blinded data will be analysed by two independent statisticians blinded to the intervention, where {\textquoteleft}A{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}B{\textquoteright} refer to the two groups. A third party will compare these reports, and discrepancies will be discussed. The statistical report with the analyses chosen for the manuscript is being tracked using a version control system, and both statistical reports will be published as a supplementary material. Based on the final statistical report, two blinded conclusions will be drawn by the steering group. Discussion: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the TEENS feasibility trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by a pre-programmed version-controlled statistical report with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04243603. Registered on 28 January 2020",
keywords = "Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA), Internet-based intervention, Non-suicidal self-injury, Randomised feasibility trial, Statistical analysis plan",
author = "Olsen, {Markus Harboe} and Britt Morthorst and Pagsberg, {Anne Katrine} and Michella Heinrichsen and Bo M{\o}hl and Lotte Rub{\ae}k and Johan Bjureberg and Olivia Simonsson and Jane Lindschou and Christian Gluud and Jakobsen, {Janus Christian}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021, The Author(s).",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
journal = "Trials",
issn = "1745-6215",
publisher = "BioMed Central Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - An Internet-based emotion regulation intervention versus no intervention for non-suicidal self-injury in adolescents

T2 - a statistical analysis plan for a feasibility randomised clinical trial

AU - Olsen, Markus Harboe

AU - Morthorst, Britt

AU - Pagsberg, Anne Katrine

AU - Heinrichsen, Michella

AU - Møhl, Bo

AU - Rubæk, Lotte

AU - Bjureberg, Johan

AU - Simonsson, Olivia

AU - Lindschou, Jane

AU - Gluud, Christian

AU - Jakobsen, Janus Christian

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s).

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and safety of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as an add-on to treatment as usual in 13–17-year-old patients with NSSI referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Methods: The TEENS feasibility trial is a randomised clinical trial with a parallel-group design. The trial intervention is an 11-week online therapy which is tested as an add-on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual. The primary feasibility outcomes are the fraction of participants who (1) completed 12 weeks of follow-up interview or assessment, (2) consented to inclusion and randomisation out of all eligible participants, and (3) were compliant with the experimental intervention, assessed as completion of at least six out of eleven modules in the programme. Since this is a feasibility trial, we did not predefine a required sample size. The exploratory clinical outcome, the frequency of NSSI episodes, assessed using Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory – Youth version (DSHI-Y), at the end of intervention, is planned to be the future primary outcome in a larger pragmatic definitive randomised clinical trial. After completion of the feasibility trial, blinded data will be analysed by two independent statisticians blinded to the intervention, where ‘A’ and ‘B’ refer to the two groups. A third party will compare these reports, and discrepancies will be discussed. The statistical report with the analyses chosen for the manuscript is being tracked using a version control system, and both statistical reports will be published as a supplementary material. Based on the final statistical report, two blinded conclusions will be drawn by the steering group. Discussion: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the TEENS feasibility trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by a pre-programmed version-controlled statistical report with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04243603. Registered on 28 January 2020

AB - Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) has a lifetime prevalence of 17% in adolescents in the general population and up to 74% in adolescents with psychiatric disorders. NSSI is one of the most important predictors of later suicidal behaviour and death by suicide. The TEENS feasibility trial was initiated to assess the feasibility and safety of Internet-based Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA) as an add-on to treatment as usual in 13–17-year-old patients with NSSI referred to the Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services. Methods: The TEENS feasibility trial is a randomised clinical trial with a parallel-group design. The trial intervention is an 11-week online therapy which is tested as an add-on to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual. The primary feasibility outcomes are the fraction of participants who (1) completed 12 weeks of follow-up interview or assessment, (2) consented to inclusion and randomisation out of all eligible participants, and (3) were compliant with the experimental intervention, assessed as completion of at least six out of eleven modules in the programme. Since this is a feasibility trial, we did not predefine a required sample size. The exploratory clinical outcome, the frequency of NSSI episodes, assessed using Deliberate Self-Harm Inventory – Youth version (DSHI-Y), at the end of intervention, is planned to be the future primary outcome in a larger pragmatic definitive randomised clinical trial. After completion of the feasibility trial, blinded data will be analysed by two independent statisticians blinded to the intervention, where ‘A’ and ‘B’ refer to the two groups. A third party will compare these reports, and discrepancies will be discussed. The statistical report with the analyses chosen for the manuscript is being tracked using a version control system, and both statistical reports will be published as a supplementary material. Based on the final statistical report, two blinded conclusions will be drawn by the steering group. Discussion: We present a pre-defined statistical analysis plan for the TEENS feasibility trial, which limits bias, p-hacking, data-driven interpretations. This statistical analysis plan is accompanied by a pre-programmed version-controlled statistical report with simulated data, which increases transparency and reproducibility. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04243603. Registered on 28 January 2020

KW - Emotion Regulation Individual Therapy for Adolescents (ERITA)

KW - Internet-based intervention

KW - Non-suicidal self-injury

KW - Randomised feasibility trial

KW - Statistical analysis plan

U2 - 10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2

DO - 10.1186/s13063-021-05406-2

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34271984

AN - SCOPUS:85111873144

VL - 22

JO - Trials

JF - Trials

SN - 1745-6215

M1 - 456

ER -

ID: 276273398