Predictors of ASDAS-CRP inactive disease in axial spondyloarthritis during treatment with TNF-inhibitors: Data from the EuroSpA collaboration

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 1,33 MB, PDF-dokument

  • Lykke M. Ørnbjerg
  • Louise Linde
  • Stylianos Georgiadis
  • Simon H. Rasmussen
  • Ulf Lindström
  • Johan Askling
  • Brigitte Michelsen
  • Daniela Di Giuseppe
  • Johan K. Wallman
  • Karel Pavelka
  • Jakub Závada
  • Michael J. Nissen
  • Gareth T. Jones
  • Heikki Relas
  • Laura Pirilä
  • Matija Tomšič
  • Ziga Rotar
  • Arni Jon Geirsson
  • Bjorn Gudbjornsson
  • Eirik K. Kristianslund
  • Irene van sder Horst-Bruinsma
  • Anne Gitte Loft
  • Karin Laas
  • Florenzo Iannone
  • Addolorata Corrado
  • Adrian Ciurea
  • Maria J. Santos
  • Helena Santos
  • Catalin Codreanu
  • Nurullah Akkoc
  • Ozgul S. Gunduz

Objectives: In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) initiating their first tumor necrosis factor alpha-inhibitor (TNFi), we aimed to identify common baseline predictors of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS-CRP) inactive disease (primary objective) and clinically important improvement (CII) at 6 months, and drug retention at 12-months across 15 European registries. Methods: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Outcomes were investigated per registry and in pooled data using logistic regression analyses on multiply imputed data. Results: The consistency of baseline predictors in individual registries justified pooling the data. In the pooled dataset (n = 21,196), the 6-month rates for ASDAS inactive disease and ASDAS CII were 26% and 51%, and the 12-month drug retention rate 65% in patients with available data (n = 9,845, n = 6,948 and n = 21,196, respectively). Nine common baseline predictors of ASDAS inactive disease, ASDAS CII and 12-month drug retention were identified, and the odds ratios (95%-confidence interval) for ASDAS inactive disease were: age, per year: 0.97 (0.97–0.98), men vs. women: 1.88 (1.60–2.22), current vs. non-smoking: 0.76 (0.63–0.91), HLA-B27 positive vs. negative: 1.51 (1.20–1.91), TNF start year 2015–2018 vs. 2009–2014: 1.24 (1.06–1.45), CRP>10 vs. ≤10 mg/l: 1.49 (1.25–1.77), one unit increase in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ): 0.77 (0.58–1.03), one-millimeter (mm) increase in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) fatigue and spinal pain: 0.99 (0.99–1.00) and 0.99 (0.99–1.99), respectively Conclusion: Common baseline predictors of treatment response and adherence to TNFi could be identified across data from 15 European registries, indicating that they may be universal across different axSpA populations.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer152081
TidsskriftSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Vol/bind56
ISSN0049-0172
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
LMØ, LL, SG and SHR: research grants from Novartis; UL: none; DDG none; JKW: consultant of AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Novartis; BG: research grants from Pfizer, Abbvie and BMS; LP: consultant of Novartis Finland, UCB Pharma, Pfizer, Sanofi, BMS, AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Mylan; KL: consulting and/or speaking fees from Amgen, Johnson and Johnson and Novartis; ACo: research grants, consulting and/or speaking fees from Amgen, Lilly, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim; KP: speaker and consulting fees from Pfizer, MSD, BMS, UCB, Amgen, Egis, Roche, AbbVie; JZ: speaker and consulting fees from Abbvie, Elli-Lilly, Sandoz, Novartis, Egis, UCB; EKK: none; NA: speaking fees from Pfizer; ÖSG: none; HS: research grant from Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia and speaker and/or consultancy fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer; MJN: consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssens, Novartis and Pfizer; BM: research grant from Novartis; GTJ: research grants from AbbVie, Pfizer, UCB, Amgen, GSK. Speaker fee from Janssen; HR: consulting and/or speaking fees from Abbvie, Celgene, Pfizer, UCB, and Viatris; MT: consulting and/or speaking fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medis, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Sandoz-Lek; AJG: none; IHB: Consultant for Abbvie, UCB, MSD, Novartis, Lilly, unrestricted Grants received for investigator initiated studies from: MSD, Pfizer, AbbVie, UCB, fees received for Lectures from BMS, AbbVie, Pfizer, MSD ; JA: PI for agreements between Karolinska Institutet and Abbvie, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Eli Lilly, Janssen, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, and UCB; FI: consulting and/or speaking from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB; AGL: Research Grant from Novartis, and speaker and/or consultancy fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB; ACi: consulting and/or speaking fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Pfizer; MJS: speaker fees from Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer; CC: Speaker and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Ewopharma, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer; ZR: speaker or consultancy fees from Abbvie, Novartis, MSD, Medis, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Lek, Janssen; BjG: consulting and/or speaking fees from Amgen and Novartis; MØ: research grants from Abbvie, BMS, Merck, Celgene and Novartis, and speaker and/or consultancy fees from Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli-Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi and UCB; MLH: Research grants from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Janssen Biologics B.V, Lundbeck Fonden, MSD, Medac, Pfizer, Roche, Samsung Biopies, Sandoz, Novartis.

Funding Information:
This work was supported by Novartis Pharma AG .

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022

ID: 320651940