Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache. / Cvetkovic, Vlasta Vukovic; Jensen, Rigmor H.

I: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Bind 139, Nr. 1, 2019, s. 4-17.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Cvetkovic, VV & Jensen, RH 2019, 'Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache', Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, bind 139, nr. 1, s. 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13034

APA

Cvetkovic, V. V., & Jensen, R. H. (2019). Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 139(1), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13034

Vancouver

Cvetkovic VV, Jensen RH. Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2019;139(1):4-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13034

Author

Cvetkovic, Vlasta Vukovic ; Jensen, Rigmor H. / Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache. I: Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 2019 ; Bind 139, Nr. 1. s. 4-17.

Bibtex

@article{b0735732f37443a39e7646089d3e939c,
title = "Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache",
abstract = "Small subsets of patients who fail to respond to pharmacological treatment may benefit from alternative treatment methods. In the last decade, neurostimulation is being explored as a potential treatment option for the patients with chronic, severely disabling refractory primary headaches. To alleviate pain, specific nerves and brain areas have been stimulated, and various methods have been explored: deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation are among the more invasive ones, whereas transcranial magnetic stimulation and supraorbital nerve stimulation are noninvasive. Vagal nerve stimulation can be invasive or noninvasive, though this review included only data for noninvasive VNS. Most of these methods have been tested in small open-label patient series; recently, more data from randomized, controlled, and blinded studies are available. Although neurostimulation treatments have demonstrated good efficacy in many studies, it still has not been established as a standard treatment in refractory patients. This review analyzes the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety of different neurostimulation modalities for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache.",
keywords = "Adult, Cluster Headache/therapy, Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods, Humans, Migraine Disorders/therapy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods",
author = "Cvetkovic, {Vlasta Vukovic} and Jensen, {Rigmor H.}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1111/ane.13034",
language = "English",
volume = "139",
pages = "4--17",
journal = "Acta Neurologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6314",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurostimulation for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache

AU - Cvetkovic, Vlasta Vukovic

AU - Jensen, Rigmor H.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Small subsets of patients who fail to respond to pharmacological treatment may benefit from alternative treatment methods. In the last decade, neurostimulation is being explored as a potential treatment option for the patients with chronic, severely disabling refractory primary headaches. To alleviate pain, specific nerves and brain areas have been stimulated, and various methods have been explored: deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation are among the more invasive ones, whereas transcranial magnetic stimulation and supraorbital nerve stimulation are noninvasive. Vagal nerve stimulation can be invasive or noninvasive, though this review included only data for noninvasive VNS. Most of these methods have been tested in small open-label patient series; recently, more data from randomized, controlled, and blinded studies are available. Although neurostimulation treatments have demonstrated good efficacy in many studies, it still has not been established as a standard treatment in refractory patients. This review analyzes the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety of different neurostimulation modalities for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache.

AB - Small subsets of patients who fail to respond to pharmacological treatment may benefit from alternative treatment methods. In the last decade, neurostimulation is being explored as a potential treatment option for the patients with chronic, severely disabling refractory primary headaches. To alleviate pain, specific nerves and brain areas have been stimulated, and various methods have been explored: deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, and sphenopalatine ganglion stimulation are among the more invasive ones, whereas transcranial magnetic stimulation and supraorbital nerve stimulation are noninvasive. Vagal nerve stimulation can be invasive or noninvasive, though this review included only data for noninvasive VNS. Most of these methods have been tested in small open-label patient series; recently, more data from randomized, controlled, and blinded studies are available. Although neurostimulation treatments have demonstrated good efficacy in many studies, it still has not been established as a standard treatment in refractory patients. This review analyzes the available evidence regarding efficacy and safety of different neurostimulation modalities for the treatment of chronic migraine and cluster headache.

KW - Adult

KW - Cluster Headache/therapy

KW - Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Migraine Disorders/therapy

KW - Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods

U2 - 10.1111/ane.13034

DO - 10.1111/ane.13034

M3 - Review

C2 - 30291633

VL - 139

SP - 4

EP - 17

JO - Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Neurologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6314

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 224286552