Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus. / Jørsboe, Pernille Henszelman; Pedersen, Michael Stage; Benyahia, Mostafa; Kallemose, Thomas; Penny, Jeannette.

I: Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Bind 60, Nr. 2, 2021, s. 322-327.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jørsboe, PH, Pedersen, MS, Benyahia, M, Kallemose, T & Penny, J 2021, 'Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus', Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, bind 60, nr. 2, s. 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010

APA

Jørsboe, P. H., Pedersen, M. S., Benyahia, M., Kallemose, T., & Penny, J. (2021). Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery, 60(2), 322-327. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010

Vancouver

Jørsboe PH, Pedersen MS, Benyahia M, Kallemose T, Penny J. Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2021;60(2):322-327. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010

Author

Jørsboe, Pernille Henszelman ; Pedersen, Michael Stage ; Benyahia, Mostafa ; Kallemose, Thomas ; Penny, Jeannette. / Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus. I: Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2021 ; Bind 60, Nr. 2. s. 322-327.

Bibtex

@article{36ed4d0de53b42b3a37f2a5cfb6e8565,
title = "Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP{\textregistered} Implants for Hallux Rigidus",
abstract = "Hallux rigidus can be treated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP{\textregistered}) to preserve the motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint and reduce pain. This study examines the functionality, and survival rates of HemiCAP{\textregistered} implants, with or without a dorsal flange. One hundred and five patients were treated with a HemiCAP{\textregistered} (N = 116 HemiCAPs{\textregistered}) between 2006 and 2014. Revision rates, arthrosis score, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsal (IM), distal metaphyseal articular angle (DMAA), visual analog scale (VAS) (1-10 points), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) MTP-IP (AOFAS 0-100 points), SF-12, range of motion (ROM), and radiographs were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Statistics: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox-regression, and paired t tests. At 2, 4, and 6 years, the implant survival was 87%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. All revised due to pain. Dorsal flange, gender, arthrosis, HV, IM, and DMAA did not influence the results. At the mean 5-year follow-up (n = 47) median (range) dorsal ROM was 45° (10°-75°), AOFAS was mean 87.2 ± 10.8, VAS was 2 ± 1.6, and SEFAS was 42 ± 6 points. The dorsal flange made no significant difference for ROM or patient-reported outcome measures compared to the HemiCAP{\textregistered} with no dorsal flange. Twenty-three patients with preoperative data were re-examined, and preoperative dorsal ROM mean difference (confidence interval [CI]) increased 20.7° (13.9°-27.4°), VAS decreased with a mean difference (CI) of −4.7 (−5.8 to 3.5), and AOFAS increased with a mean difference (CI) 26.2 (20.2-32.2) (for all p < .001). The 6-year survival rate of the HemiCAP{\textregistered} implant was 81%. The design change to dorsal flange was not evident clinically. Unrevised patients had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better foot and ankle function than preoperatively.",
keywords = "3, first metatarsophalangeal joint, forefoot surgery, hemiarthroplasty, osteoarthritis, range of motion",
author = "J{\o}rsboe, {Pernille Henszelman} and Pedersen, {Michael Stage} and Mostafa Benyahia and Thomas Kallemose and Jeannette Penny",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "322--327",
journal = "Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery",
issn = "1067-2516",
publisher = "W.B.Saunders Co.",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mid-Term Functionality and Survival of 116 HemiCAP® Implants for Hallux Rigidus

AU - Jørsboe, Pernille Henszelman

AU - Pedersen, Michael Stage

AU - Benyahia, Mostafa

AU - Kallemose, Thomas

AU - Penny, Jeannette

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Hallux rigidus can be treated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP®) to preserve the motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint and reduce pain. This study examines the functionality, and survival rates of HemiCAP® implants, with or without a dorsal flange. One hundred and five patients were treated with a HemiCAP® (N = 116 HemiCAPs®) between 2006 and 2014. Revision rates, arthrosis score, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsal (IM), distal metaphyseal articular angle (DMAA), visual analog scale (VAS) (1-10 points), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) MTP-IP (AOFAS 0-100 points), SF-12, range of motion (ROM), and radiographs were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Statistics: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox-regression, and paired t tests. At 2, 4, and 6 years, the implant survival was 87%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. All revised due to pain. Dorsal flange, gender, arthrosis, HV, IM, and DMAA did not influence the results. At the mean 5-year follow-up (n = 47) median (range) dorsal ROM was 45° (10°-75°), AOFAS was mean 87.2 ± 10.8, VAS was 2 ± 1.6, and SEFAS was 42 ± 6 points. The dorsal flange made no significant difference for ROM or patient-reported outcome measures compared to the HemiCAP® with no dorsal flange. Twenty-three patients with preoperative data were re-examined, and preoperative dorsal ROM mean difference (confidence interval [CI]) increased 20.7° (13.9°-27.4°), VAS decreased with a mean difference (CI) of −4.7 (−5.8 to 3.5), and AOFAS increased with a mean difference (CI) 26.2 (20.2-32.2) (for all p < .001). The 6-year survival rate of the HemiCAP® implant was 81%. The design change to dorsal flange was not evident clinically. Unrevised patients had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better foot and ankle function than preoperatively.

AB - Hallux rigidus can be treated with a proximal hemiarthroplasty (HemiCAP®) to preserve the motion in the first metatarsophalangeal joint and reduce pain. This study examines the functionality, and survival rates of HemiCAP® implants, with or without a dorsal flange. One hundred and five patients were treated with a HemiCAP® (N = 116 HemiCAPs®) between 2006 and 2014. Revision rates, arthrosis score, hallux valgus (HV), intermetatarsal (IM), distal metaphyseal articular angle (DMAA), visual analog scale (VAS) (1-10 points), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) MTP-IP (AOFAS 0-100 points), SF-12, range of motion (ROM), and radiographs were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Statistics: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox-regression, and paired t tests. At 2, 4, and 6 years, the implant survival was 87%, 83%, and 81%, respectively. All revised due to pain. Dorsal flange, gender, arthrosis, HV, IM, and DMAA did not influence the results. At the mean 5-year follow-up (n = 47) median (range) dorsal ROM was 45° (10°-75°), AOFAS was mean 87.2 ± 10.8, VAS was 2 ± 1.6, and SEFAS was 42 ± 6 points. The dorsal flange made no significant difference for ROM or patient-reported outcome measures compared to the HemiCAP® with no dorsal flange. Twenty-three patients with preoperative data were re-examined, and preoperative dorsal ROM mean difference (confidence interval [CI]) increased 20.7° (13.9°-27.4°), VAS decreased with a mean difference (CI) of −4.7 (−5.8 to 3.5), and AOFAS increased with a mean difference (CI) 26.2 (20.2-32.2) (for all p < .001). The 6-year survival rate of the HemiCAP® implant was 81%. The design change to dorsal flange was not evident clinically. Unrevised patients had significantly less pain, greater ROM, and better foot and ankle function than preoperatively.

KW - 3

KW - first metatarsophalangeal joint

KW - forefoot surgery

KW - hemiarthroplasty

KW - osteoarthritis

KW - range of motion

U2 - 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010

DO - 10.1053/j.jfas.2020.10.010

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33423889

AN - SCOPUS:85099237485

VL - 60

SP - 322

EP - 327

JO - Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery

JF - Journal of Foot & Ankle Surgery

SN - 1067-2516

IS - 2

ER -

ID: 305411182