Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests: Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests : Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit. / Jacobsen, Niels; Pietersen, Pia Iben; Nolsoe, Christian; Konge, Lars; Graumann, Ole; Laursen, Christian Borbjerg.

I: Ultraschall in der Medizin, Bind 43, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 72-81.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jacobsen, N, Pietersen, PI, Nolsoe, C, Konge, L, Graumann, O & Laursen, CB 2022, 'Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests: Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit', Ultraschall in der Medizin, bind 43, nr. 1, s. 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1143-3141

APA

Jacobsen, N., Pietersen, P. I., Nolsoe, C., Konge, L., Graumann, O., & Laursen, C. B. (2022). Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests: Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit. Ultraschall in der Medizin, 43(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1143-3141

Vancouver

Jacobsen N, Pietersen PI, Nolsoe C, Konge L, Graumann O, Laursen CB. Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests: Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit. Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2022;43(1):72-81. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1143-3141

Author

Jacobsen, Niels ; Pietersen, Pia Iben ; Nolsoe, Christian ; Konge, Lars ; Graumann, Ole ; Laursen, Christian Borbjerg. / Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests : Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit. I: Ultraschall in der Medizin. 2022 ; Bind 43, Nr. 1. s. 72-81.

Bibtex

@article{98b87df8350a43129b449093d0f156b3,
title = "Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests: Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit",
abstract = "Introduction Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is utilized in an increasing array of medical fields, including thoracic medicine. However, the technique is still relatively new and only sporadically mentioned in current guidelines and recommendations. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a literature overview and to critically appraise the current clinical applications of contrast-enhanced thoracic ultrasound (CETUS). Materials and Methods A systematic literature search using major electronic databases and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies with a primary focus on CETUS of thoracic disorders compared to a standard reference test were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. Results The search identified 43 articles: 1 randomized controlled study, 6 non-randomized controlled studies, 16 non-randomized non-controlled studies, 5 case series, 10 single case reports, and 5 animal studies. The overall risk of bias was judged to be high. Diagnostic accuracy measurements of noninvasive applications of CETUS were only reported in a few studies and they were too dissimilar for meta-analysis. Six studies compared CETUS-guided versus ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of thoracic masses. They individually reported a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy in favor of CETUS guidance but were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. Conclusion The current literature on CETUS is overall heterogeneous with a few high evidence level studies, small study populations and a high risk of bias. CETUS-guided biopsy is the most frequent clinical application and increases diagnostic accuracy compared to ultrasound guidance by an average of 14.6 percentage points.",
keywords = "chest, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, systematic review",
author = "Niels Jacobsen and Pietersen, {Pia Iben} and Christian Nolsoe and Lars Konge and Ole Graumann and Laursen, {Christian Borbjerg}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Ultraschall in der Medizin 2022.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1055/a-1143-3141",
language = "Tysk",
volume = "43",
pages = "72--81",
journal = "Ultraschall in der Medizin",
issn = "0172-4614",
publisher = "GeorgThieme Verlag",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Klinische Anwendungen von kontrastverstarktem Thorax-Ultraschall (CETUS) im Vergleich zu Standard-Referenztests

T2 - Eine systematische Ubersichtsarbeit

AU - Jacobsen, Niels

AU - Pietersen, Pia Iben

AU - Nolsoe, Christian

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Graumann, Ole

AU - Laursen, Christian Borbjerg

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Ultraschall in der Medizin 2022.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Introduction Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is utilized in an increasing array of medical fields, including thoracic medicine. However, the technique is still relatively new and only sporadically mentioned in current guidelines and recommendations. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a literature overview and to critically appraise the current clinical applications of contrast-enhanced thoracic ultrasound (CETUS). Materials and Methods A systematic literature search using major electronic databases and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies with a primary focus on CETUS of thoracic disorders compared to a standard reference test were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. Results The search identified 43 articles: 1 randomized controlled study, 6 non-randomized controlled studies, 16 non-randomized non-controlled studies, 5 case series, 10 single case reports, and 5 animal studies. The overall risk of bias was judged to be high. Diagnostic accuracy measurements of noninvasive applications of CETUS were only reported in a few studies and they were too dissimilar for meta-analysis. Six studies compared CETUS-guided versus ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of thoracic masses. They individually reported a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy in favor of CETUS guidance but were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. Conclusion The current literature on CETUS is overall heterogeneous with a few high evidence level studies, small study populations and a high risk of bias. CETUS-guided biopsy is the most frequent clinical application and increases diagnostic accuracy compared to ultrasound guidance by an average of 14.6 percentage points.

AB - Introduction Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is utilized in an increasing array of medical fields, including thoracic medicine. However, the technique is still relatively new and only sporadically mentioned in current guidelines and recommendations. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a literature overview and to critically appraise the current clinical applications of contrast-enhanced thoracic ultrasound (CETUS). Materials and Methods A systematic literature search using major electronic databases and in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies with a primary focus on CETUS of thoracic disorders compared to a standard reference test were included. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for quality assessment of the studies. Results The search identified 43 articles: 1 randomized controlled study, 6 non-randomized controlled studies, 16 non-randomized non-controlled studies, 5 case series, 10 single case reports, and 5 animal studies. The overall risk of bias was judged to be high. Diagnostic accuracy measurements of noninvasive applications of CETUS were only reported in a few studies and they were too dissimilar for meta-analysis. Six studies compared CETUS-guided versus ultrasound-guided transthoracic needle biopsy of thoracic masses. They individually reported a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy in favor of CETUS guidance but were too heterogeneous for meta-analysis. Conclusion The current literature on CETUS is overall heterogeneous with a few high evidence level studies, small study populations and a high risk of bias. CETUS-guided biopsy is the most frequent clinical application and increases diagnostic accuracy compared to ultrasound guidance by an average of 14.6 percentage points.

KW - chest

KW - contrast-enhanced ultrasound

KW - systematic review

U2 - 10.1055/a-1143-3141

DO - 10.1055/a-1143-3141

M3 - Review

C2 - 32259873

AN - SCOPUS:85124433674

VL - 43

SP - 72

EP - 81

JO - Ultraschall in der Medizin

JF - Ultraschall in der Medizin

SN - 0172-4614

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 315179795