Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery : effectiveness and safety in a population-based study. / Jakobsen, Carl-Johan; Søndergaard, Flemming; Hjortdal, Vibeke E; Johnsen, Søren P.
I: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Bind 36, Nr. 5, 11.2009, s. 863-8.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery
T2 - effectiveness and safety in a population-based study
AU - Jakobsen, Carl-Johan
AU - Søndergaard, Flemming
AU - Hjortdal, Vibeke E
AU - Johnsen, Søren P
PY - 2009/11
Y1 - 2009/11
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery have been questioned. More data reflecting everyday clinical practice from large-scale, unselected populations are needed. We compared the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with those of tranexamic acid in a follow-up study using the population-based Danish health-care databases.METHODS: We identified a total of 3535 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006; of these, 635 patients were treated with aprotinin and 2900 with tranexamic acid. We used propensity score matching to match aprotinin-treated patients with tranexamic-acid-treated patients in a 1:1 ratio, followed by Poisson regression analysis to compute relative risks (RRs).RESULTS: Patients treated with aprotinin had more severe preoperative risk profiles than the tranexamic-acid-treated patients. The rates of postoperative drainage and transfusion of red blood cells were similar in the two groups, whereas the aprotinin group received plasma (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.68) and platelets (adjusted RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.19-1.81) more frequently than the tranexamic acid group. There were no statistically significant differences in risks of re-operation due to bleeding (adjusted RR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.84-1.78), 30-day mortality (adjusted RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.54), acute myocardial infarction (adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64), stroke (adjusted RR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.75-2.44) or composite major event (adjusted RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.50) between the two groups. However, patients who received aprotinin had an increased risk of postoperative dialysis (adjusted RR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.70).CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment was associated with an increased use of plasma and platelet transfusion and an increased risk for postoperative dialysis, but not with other adverse outcomes, including short-term mortality.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery have been questioned. More data reflecting everyday clinical practice from large-scale, unselected populations are needed. We compared the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with those of tranexamic acid in a follow-up study using the population-based Danish health-care databases.METHODS: We identified a total of 3535 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006; of these, 635 patients were treated with aprotinin and 2900 with tranexamic acid. We used propensity score matching to match aprotinin-treated patients with tranexamic-acid-treated patients in a 1:1 ratio, followed by Poisson regression analysis to compute relative risks (RRs).RESULTS: Patients treated with aprotinin had more severe preoperative risk profiles than the tranexamic-acid-treated patients. The rates of postoperative drainage and transfusion of red blood cells were similar in the two groups, whereas the aprotinin group received plasma (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.68) and platelets (adjusted RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.19-1.81) more frequently than the tranexamic acid group. There were no statistically significant differences in risks of re-operation due to bleeding (adjusted RR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.84-1.78), 30-day mortality (adjusted RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.54), acute myocardial infarction (adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64), stroke (adjusted RR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.75-2.44) or composite major event (adjusted RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.50) between the two groups. However, patients who received aprotinin had an increased risk of postoperative dialysis (adjusted RR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.70).CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment was associated with an increased use of plasma and platelet transfusion and an increased risk for postoperative dialysis, but not with other adverse outcomes, including short-term mortality.
KW - Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced
KW - Aged
KW - Aged, 80 and over
KW - Aprotinin/adverse effects
KW - Blood Component Transfusion
KW - Cardiac Surgical Procedures
KW - Drug Evaluation
KW - Epidemiologic Methods
KW - Female
KW - Hemostasis, Surgical/methods
KW - Hemostatics/adverse effects
KW - Humans
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Perioperative Care/methods
KW - Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control
KW - Renal Dialysis
KW - Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040
DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 19782573
VL - 36
SP - 863
EP - 868
JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
SN - 1010-7940
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 242714248