Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery : effectiveness and safety in a population-based study. / Jakobsen, Carl-Johan; Søndergaard, Flemming; Hjortdal, Vibeke E; Johnsen, Søren P.

I: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, Bind 36, Nr. 5, 11.2009, s. 863-8.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jakobsen, C-J, Søndergaard, F, Hjortdal, VE & Johnsen, SP 2009, 'Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study', European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, bind 36, nr. 5, s. 863-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040

APA

Jakobsen, C-J., Søndergaard, F., Hjortdal, V. E., & Johnsen, S. P. (2009). Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery, 36(5), 863-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040

Vancouver

Jakobsen C-J, Søndergaard F, Hjortdal VE, Johnsen SP. Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2009 nov.;36(5):863-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040

Author

Jakobsen, Carl-Johan ; Søndergaard, Flemming ; Hjortdal, Vibeke E ; Johnsen, Søren P. / Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery : effectiveness and safety in a population-based study. I: European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2009 ; Bind 36, Nr. 5. s. 863-8.

Bibtex

@article{0de332acf57e408f8005e363371c1573,
title = "Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery: effectiveness and safety in a population-based study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery have been questioned. More data reflecting everyday clinical practice from large-scale, unselected populations are needed. We compared the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with those of tranexamic acid in a follow-up study using the population-based Danish health-care databases.METHODS: We identified a total of 3535 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006; of these, 635 patients were treated with aprotinin and 2900 with tranexamic acid. We used propensity score matching to match aprotinin-treated patients with tranexamic-acid-treated patients in a 1:1 ratio, followed by Poisson regression analysis to compute relative risks (RRs).RESULTS: Patients treated with aprotinin had more severe preoperative risk profiles than the tranexamic-acid-treated patients. The rates of postoperative drainage and transfusion of red blood cells were similar in the two groups, whereas the aprotinin group received plasma (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.68) and platelets (adjusted RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.19-1.81) more frequently than the tranexamic acid group. There were no statistically significant differences in risks of re-operation due to bleeding (adjusted RR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.84-1.78), 30-day mortality (adjusted RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.54), acute myocardial infarction (adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64), stroke (adjusted RR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.75-2.44) or composite major event (adjusted RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.50) between the two groups. However, patients who received aprotinin had an increased risk of postoperative dialysis (adjusted RR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.70).CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment was associated with an increased use of plasma and platelet transfusion and an increased risk for postoperative dialysis, but not with other adverse outcomes, including short-term mortality.",
keywords = "Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aprotinin/adverse effects, Blood Component Transfusion, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Drug Evaluation, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Hemostasis, Surgical/methods, Hemostatics/adverse effects, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perioperative Care/methods, Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control, Renal Dialysis, Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Carl-Johan Jakobsen and Flemming S{\o}ndergaard and Hjortdal, {Vibeke E} and Johnsen, {S{\o}ren P}",
year = "2009",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "863--8",
journal = "European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery",
issn = "1010-7940",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery

T2 - effectiveness and safety in a population-based study

AU - Jakobsen, Carl-Johan

AU - Søndergaard, Flemming

AU - Hjortdal, Vibeke E

AU - Johnsen, Søren P

PY - 2009/11

Y1 - 2009/11

N2 - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery have been questioned. More data reflecting everyday clinical practice from large-scale, unselected populations are needed. We compared the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with those of tranexamic acid in a follow-up study using the population-based Danish health-care databases.METHODS: We identified a total of 3535 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006; of these, 635 patients were treated with aprotinin and 2900 with tranexamic acid. We used propensity score matching to match aprotinin-treated patients with tranexamic-acid-treated patients in a 1:1 ratio, followed by Poisson regression analysis to compute relative risks (RRs).RESULTS: Patients treated with aprotinin had more severe preoperative risk profiles than the tranexamic-acid-treated patients. The rates of postoperative drainage and transfusion of red blood cells were similar in the two groups, whereas the aprotinin group received plasma (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.68) and platelets (adjusted RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.19-1.81) more frequently than the tranexamic acid group. There were no statistically significant differences in risks of re-operation due to bleeding (adjusted RR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.84-1.78), 30-day mortality (adjusted RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.54), acute myocardial infarction (adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64), stroke (adjusted RR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.75-2.44) or composite major event (adjusted RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.50) between the two groups. However, patients who received aprotinin had an increased risk of postoperative dialysis (adjusted RR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.70).CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment was associated with an increased use of plasma and platelet transfusion and an increased risk for postoperative dialysis, but not with other adverse outcomes, including short-term mortality.

AB - OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness and safety of aprotinin use in cardiac surgery have been questioned. More data reflecting everyday clinical practice from large-scale, unselected populations are needed. We compared the effectiveness and safety of aprotinin in cardiac surgery with those of tranexamic acid in a follow-up study using the population-based Danish health-care databases.METHODS: We identified a total of 3535 patients who underwent cardiac surgery at the Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2006; of these, 635 patients were treated with aprotinin and 2900 with tranexamic acid. We used propensity score matching to match aprotinin-treated patients with tranexamic-acid-treated patients in a 1:1 ratio, followed by Poisson regression analysis to compute relative risks (RRs).RESULTS: Patients treated with aprotinin had more severe preoperative risk profiles than the tranexamic-acid-treated patients. The rates of postoperative drainage and transfusion of red blood cells were similar in the two groups, whereas the aprotinin group received plasma (adjusted RR=1.39; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.68) and platelets (adjusted RR=1.47; 95% CI: 1.19-1.81) more frequently than the tranexamic acid group. There were no statistically significant differences in risks of re-operation due to bleeding (adjusted RR=1.22; 95% CI: 0.84-1.78), 30-day mortality (adjusted RR=1.03; 95% CI: 0.69-1.54), acute myocardial infarction (adjusted RR=1.06; 95% CI: 0.69-1.64), stroke (adjusted RR=1.36; 95% CI: 0.75-2.44) or composite major event (adjusted RR=1.14; 95% CI: 0.87-1.50) between the two groups. However, patients who received aprotinin had an increased risk of postoperative dialysis (adjusted RR=1.76; 95% CI: 1.15-2.70).CONCLUSIONS: Aprotinin treatment was associated with an increased use of plasma and platelet transfusion and an increased risk for postoperative dialysis, but not with other adverse outcomes, including short-term mortality.

KW - Acute Kidney Injury/chemically induced

KW - Aged

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Aprotinin/adverse effects

KW - Blood Component Transfusion

KW - Cardiac Surgical Procedures

KW - Drug Evaluation

KW - Epidemiologic Methods

KW - Female

KW - Hemostasis, Surgical/methods

KW - Hemostatics/adverse effects

KW - Humans

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Perioperative Care/methods

KW - Postoperative Hemorrhage/prevention & control

KW - Renal Dialysis

KW - Tranexamic Acid/adverse effects

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040

DO - 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.05.040

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 19782573

VL - 36

SP - 863

EP - 868

JO - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

JF - European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery

SN - 1010-7940

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 242714248