Re: Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Re : Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial. / Fode, Mikkel; Jensen, Christian Fuglesang S.; Sønksen, Jens.
I: European Urology, Bind 85, Nr. 1, 2024, s. 93.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Kommentar/debat › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Re
T2 - Platelet-rich Plasma for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
AU - Fode, Mikkel
AU - Jensen, Christian Fuglesang S.
AU - Sønksen, Jens
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Masterson et al. [1] have presented the third randomized controlled trial (RCT) on platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Men with vasculogenic ED were assigned to intracavernosal PRP injections (n = 28) or placebo (n = 33). No significant differences were noted between the arms: 58.3%, 41.7%, and 60% of the PRP group, and 53.6%, 52%, and 41.7% of the placebo group met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scale at 1, 3, and 6 mo, respectively. The findings are in contrast to two previous RCTs and the inconsistencies necessitate a closer examination of the studies.
AB - Masterson et al. [1] have presented the third randomized controlled trial (RCT) on platelet-rich-plasma (PRP) and erectile dysfunction (ED). Men with vasculogenic ED were assigned to intracavernosal PRP injections (n = 28) or placebo (n = 33). No significant differences were noted between the arms: 58.3%, 41.7%, and 60% of the PRP group, and 53.6%, 52%, and 41.7% of the placebo group met the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the International Index of Erectile Function-Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) scale at 1, 3, and 6 mo, respectively. The findings are in contrast to two previous RCTs and the inconsistencies necessitate a closer examination of the studies.
U2 - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.018
DO - 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.08.018
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 37696736
AN - SCOPUS:85170205287
VL - 85
SP - 93
JO - European Urology (Italian Edition)
JF - European Urology (Italian Edition)
SN - 1828-6569
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 382432574