Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models : A Validation Study. / Hendel, Kristoffer; Ortner, Vinzent K.; Fuchs, Christine S.K.; Eckhouse, Vardit; Haedersdal, Merete.
I: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Bind 53, Nr. 8, 2021, s. 1043-1049.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models
T2 - A Validation Study
AU - Hendel, Kristoffer
AU - Ortner, Vinzent K.
AU - Fuchs, Christine S.K.
AU - Eckhouse, Vardit
AU - Haedersdal, Merete
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background and Objective: We evaluated a new handheld stereoscopic imaging system capable of visualizing scars with digital three-dimensional (3D) models and providing automated morphometric estimates. The objective was to validate the repeatability and accuracy of intra- and inter-investigator scan results. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Engineered metal plates with depressed and elevated model scars (n = 72) were scanned six times by one investigator. In vivo hypertrophic and atrophic scars (n = 15) were scanned once by three investigators. The repeatability of morphometric estimates was assessed using coefficients of variation (CVs) to compare the variation among multiple scan results for both models and in vivo scars, with 0% reflecting a perfect match. Scar estimates from digital 3D reconstructions were compared with the known dimensions of physical model scars and with ruler measurements of in vivo scars. Results: A total of 48 model scars and 12 in vivo scars were eligible for automated analyses with the imaging system's proprietary software. Intra-investigator scan results for the model scars were repeatable, with low variance for all parameters: volume, area, length, and depth/height (CV: 1.8–3.1%). By comparison, inter-investigator scans of real in vivo scars resulted in slightly higher median CVs (4.4–7.3%; P < 0.05). 3D model scar estimates correlated well with the known physical dimensions of model scars for all parameters (P < 0.001) and accurately reflected the measurements of in vivo scars (P < 0.001). The six in vivo scars situated on the chest and abdomen showed the highest inter-investigator variation, due to respiratory movement artifacts. Conclusion: Stereoscopic imaging of scars generates accurate and repeatable measurement estimates that show little intra- and inter-investigator-based assessment variation. The best results are achieved by minimizing subject movement. Lasers Surg. Med.
AB - Background and Objective: We evaluated a new handheld stereoscopic imaging system capable of visualizing scars with digital three-dimensional (3D) models and providing automated morphometric estimates. The objective was to validate the repeatability and accuracy of intra- and inter-investigator scan results. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Engineered metal plates with depressed and elevated model scars (n = 72) were scanned six times by one investigator. In vivo hypertrophic and atrophic scars (n = 15) were scanned once by three investigators. The repeatability of morphometric estimates was assessed using coefficients of variation (CVs) to compare the variation among multiple scan results for both models and in vivo scars, with 0% reflecting a perfect match. Scar estimates from digital 3D reconstructions were compared with the known dimensions of physical model scars and with ruler measurements of in vivo scars. Results: A total of 48 model scars and 12 in vivo scars were eligible for automated analyses with the imaging system's proprietary software. Intra-investigator scan results for the model scars were repeatable, with low variance for all parameters: volume, area, length, and depth/height (CV: 1.8–3.1%). By comparison, inter-investigator scans of real in vivo scars resulted in slightly higher median CVs (4.4–7.3%; P < 0.05). 3D model scar estimates correlated well with the known physical dimensions of model scars for all parameters (P < 0.001) and accurately reflected the measurements of in vivo scars (P < 0.001). The six in vivo scars situated on the chest and abdomen showed the highest inter-investigator variation, due to respiratory movement artifacts. Conclusion: Stereoscopic imaging of scars generates accurate and repeatable measurement estimates that show little intra- and inter-investigator-based assessment variation. The best results are achieved by minimizing subject movement. Lasers Surg. Med.
KW - atrophic scars
KW - hypertrophic scars
KW - scar assessment
KW - stereoscopic imaging
KW - three-dimensional imaging
U2 - 10.1002/lsm.23373
DO - 10.1002/lsm.23373
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33389766
AN - SCOPUS:85099035571
VL - 53
SP - 1043
EP - 1049
JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine
SN - 0196-8092
IS - 8
ER -
ID: 302458247