Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models : A Validation Study. / Hendel, Kristoffer; Ortner, Vinzent K.; Fuchs, Christine S.K.; Eckhouse, Vardit; Haedersdal, Merete.

I: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, Bind 53, Nr. 8, 2021, s. 1043-1049.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hendel, K, Ortner, VK, Fuchs, CSK, Eckhouse, V & Haedersdal, M 2021, 'Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study', Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, bind 53, nr. 8, s. 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23373

APA

Hendel, K., Ortner, V. K., Fuchs, C. S. K., Eckhouse, V., & Haedersdal, M. (2021). Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine, 53(8), 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23373

Vancouver

Hendel K, Ortner VK, Fuchs CSK, Eckhouse V, Haedersdal M. Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2021;53(8):1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23373

Author

Hendel, Kristoffer ; Ortner, Vinzent K. ; Fuchs, Christine S.K. ; Eckhouse, Vardit ; Haedersdal, Merete. / Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models : A Validation Study. I: Lasers in Surgery and Medicine. 2021 ; Bind 53, Nr. 8. s. 1043-1049.

Bibtex

@article{18e53d45d2f8413d9957ab7632ab5a7e,
title = "Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models: A Validation Study",
abstract = "Background and Objective: We evaluated a new handheld stereoscopic imaging system capable of visualizing scars with digital three-dimensional (3D) models and providing automated morphometric estimates. The objective was to validate the repeatability and accuracy of intra- and inter-investigator scan results. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Engineered metal plates with depressed and elevated model scars (n = 72) were scanned six times by one investigator. In vivo hypertrophic and atrophic scars (n = 15) were scanned once by three investigators. The repeatability of morphometric estimates was assessed using coefficients of variation (CVs) to compare the variation among multiple scan results for both models and in vivo scars, with 0% reflecting a perfect match. Scar estimates from digital 3D reconstructions were compared with the known dimensions of physical model scars and with ruler measurements of in vivo scars. Results: A total of 48 model scars and 12 in vivo scars were eligible for automated analyses with the imaging system's proprietary software. Intra-investigator scan results for the model scars were repeatable, with low variance for all parameters: volume, area, length, and depth/height (CV: 1.8–3.1%). By comparison, inter-investigator scans of real in vivo scars resulted in slightly higher median CVs (4.4–7.3%; P < 0.05). 3D model scar estimates correlated well with the known physical dimensions of model scars for all parameters (P < 0.001) and accurately reflected the measurements of in vivo scars (P < 0.001). The six in vivo scars situated on the chest and abdomen showed the highest inter-investigator variation, due to respiratory movement artifacts. Conclusion: Stereoscopic imaging of scars generates accurate and repeatable measurement estimates that show little intra- and inter-investigator-based assessment variation. The best results are achieved by minimizing subject movement. Lasers Surg. Med.",
keywords = "atrophic scars, hypertrophic scars, scar assessment, stereoscopic imaging, three-dimensional imaging",
author = "Kristoffer Hendel and Ortner, {Vinzent K.} and Fuchs, {Christine S.K.} and Vardit Eckhouse and Merete Haedersdal",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1002/lsm.23373",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "1043--1049",
journal = "Lasers in Surgery and Medicine",
issn = "0196-8092",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dermatologic Scar Assessment With Stereoscopic Imaging and Digital Three-Dimensional Models

T2 - A Validation Study

AU - Hendel, Kristoffer

AU - Ortner, Vinzent K.

AU - Fuchs, Christine S.K.

AU - Eckhouse, Vardit

AU - Haedersdal, Merete

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background and Objective: We evaluated a new handheld stereoscopic imaging system capable of visualizing scars with digital three-dimensional (3D) models and providing automated morphometric estimates. The objective was to validate the repeatability and accuracy of intra- and inter-investigator scan results. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Engineered metal plates with depressed and elevated model scars (n = 72) were scanned six times by one investigator. In vivo hypertrophic and atrophic scars (n = 15) were scanned once by three investigators. The repeatability of morphometric estimates was assessed using coefficients of variation (CVs) to compare the variation among multiple scan results for both models and in vivo scars, with 0% reflecting a perfect match. Scar estimates from digital 3D reconstructions were compared with the known dimensions of physical model scars and with ruler measurements of in vivo scars. Results: A total of 48 model scars and 12 in vivo scars were eligible for automated analyses with the imaging system's proprietary software. Intra-investigator scan results for the model scars were repeatable, with low variance for all parameters: volume, area, length, and depth/height (CV: 1.8–3.1%). By comparison, inter-investigator scans of real in vivo scars resulted in slightly higher median CVs (4.4–7.3%; P < 0.05). 3D model scar estimates correlated well with the known physical dimensions of model scars for all parameters (P < 0.001) and accurately reflected the measurements of in vivo scars (P < 0.001). The six in vivo scars situated on the chest and abdomen showed the highest inter-investigator variation, due to respiratory movement artifacts. Conclusion: Stereoscopic imaging of scars generates accurate and repeatable measurement estimates that show little intra- and inter-investigator-based assessment variation. The best results are achieved by minimizing subject movement. Lasers Surg. Med.

AB - Background and Objective: We evaluated a new handheld stereoscopic imaging system capable of visualizing scars with digital three-dimensional (3D) models and providing automated morphometric estimates. The objective was to validate the repeatability and accuracy of intra- and inter-investigator scan results. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Engineered metal plates with depressed and elevated model scars (n = 72) were scanned six times by one investigator. In vivo hypertrophic and atrophic scars (n = 15) were scanned once by three investigators. The repeatability of morphometric estimates was assessed using coefficients of variation (CVs) to compare the variation among multiple scan results for both models and in vivo scars, with 0% reflecting a perfect match. Scar estimates from digital 3D reconstructions were compared with the known dimensions of physical model scars and with ruler measurements of in vivo scars. Results: A total of 48 model scars and 12 in vivo scars were eligible for automated analyses with the imaging system's proprietary software. Intra-investigator scan results for the model scars were repeatable, with low variance for all parameters: volume, area, length, and depth/height (CV: 1.8–3.1%). By comparison, inter-investigator scans of real in vivo scars resulted in slightly higher median CVs (4.4–7.3%; P < 0.05). 3D model scar estimates correlated well with the known physical dimensions of model scars for all parameters (P < 0.001) and accurately reflected the measurements of in vivo scars (P < 0.001). The six in vivo scars situated on the chest and abdomen showed the highest inter-investigator variation, due to respiratory movement artifacts. Conclusion: Stereoscopic imaging of scars generates accurate and repeatable measurement estimates that show little intra- and inter-investigator-based assessment variation. The best results are achieved by minimizing subject movement. Lasers Surg. Med.

KW - atrophic scars

KW - hypertrophic scars

KW - scar assessment

KW - stereoscopic imaging

KW - three-dimensional imaging

U2 - 10.1002/lsm.23373

DO - 10.1002/lsm.23373

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33389766

AN - SCOPUS:85099035571

VL - 53

SP - 1043

EP - 1049

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 8

ER -

ID: 302458247