Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice : A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs. / Fransen, Frederike; Hiel, Marjolein A.J.; Al-Niaimi, Firas; Badawi, Ashraf; Haedersdal, Merete; Laubach, Hans Joachim; Snauwaert, Johan E.; Wolkerstorfer, Albert.

I: Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, Bind 13, e63, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Fransen, F, Hiel, MAJ, Al-Niaimi, F, Badawi, A, Haedersdal, M, Laubach, HJ, Snauwaert, JE & Wolkerstorfer, A 2022, 'Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs', Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, bind 13, e63. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2022.63

APA

Fransen, F., Hiel, M. A. J., Al-Niaimi, F., Badawi, A., Haedersdal, M., Laubach, H. J., Snauwaert, J. E., & Wolkerstorfer, A. (2022). Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 13, [e63]. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2022.63

Vancouver

Fransen F, Hiel MAJ, Al-Niaimi F, Badawi A, Haedersdal M, Laubach HJ o.a. Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2022;13. e63. https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2022.63

Author

Fransen, Frederike ; Hiel, Marjolein A.J. ; Al-Niaimi, Firas ; Badawi, Ashraf ; Haedersdal, Merete ; Laubach, Hans Joachim ; Snauwaert, Johan E. ; Wolkerstorfer, Albert. / Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice : A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs. I: Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. 2022 ; Bind 13.

Bibtex

@article{6fad39d3f5c64668a8cfdcd2d655fab0,
title = "Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice: A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs",
abstract = "Introduction: Inhalation of laser-induced smoke is a potential health hazard to exposed physicians and laser operators. To date, little is known about the perception of health hazards related to laser-induced smoke exposure among physicians and the actual use of safety measures to mitigate these risks. Methods: In May 2020, 514 members of the European Society for Lasers and Energy-Based Devices (ESLD) were invited by email to participate in an online survey. The survey comprised 16 questions including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Results: Responses were received from 109 participants. The majority (90%) were aware of potential hazards and highlighted a desire for better protective measures (60%). A smoke evacuation system was frequently used with ablative lasers (66%) and fractional ablative lasers (61%), but less the case with non-ablative lasers (30%) and hair removal lasers (28%). The COVID-19 outbreak had no clear effect on the use of smoke evacuation systems. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly surgical masks were used (40-57%), while high filtration masks (FFP1, FFP2 or FFP3) were used by only a small percentage (15-30%). Post COVID-19 outbreak, the use of high filtration masks increased significantly (54-66%), predominately due to an increase in the use of FFP2 masks. Reasons mentioned for inadequate protective measures were sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, high room temperatures, and financial costs. Conclusion: While there is considerable awareness of the hazards of laser-induced smoke among physicians and laser operators, a substantial number of them do not use appropriate protective measures. The implementation of regulations on safety measures is hampered by sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, financial issues, and high room temperatures.",
keywords = "Health hazards, Laser-induced smoke, Protective measures, Surgical smoke",
author = "Frederike Fransen and Hiel, {Marjolein A.J.} and Firas Al-Niaimi and Ashraf Badawi and Merete Haedersdal and Laubach, {Hans Joachim} and Snauwaert, {Johan E.} and Albert Wolkerstorfer",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022,Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. All Rights Reserved.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.34172/jlms.2022.63",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences",
issn = "2008-9783",
publisher = "Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Laser-Induced Smoke in Dermatologic Practice

T2 - A Survey to Explore Hazard Perceptions, Safety Measures and Unmet Needs

AU - Fransen, Frederike

AU - Hiel, Marjolein A.J.

AU - Al-Niaimi, Firas

AU - Badawi, Ashraf

AU - Haedersdal, Merete

AU - Laubach, Hans Joachim

AU - Snauwaert, Johan E.

AU - Wolkerstorfer, Albert

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022,Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences. All Rights Reserved.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Introduction: Inhalation of laser-induced smoke is a potential health hazard to exposed physicians and laser operators. To date, little is known about the perception of health hazards related to laser-induced smoke exposure among physicians and the actual use of safety measures to mitigate these risks. Methods: In May 2020, 514 members of the European Society for Lasers and Energy-Based Devices (ESLD) were invited by email to participate in an online survey. The survey comprised 16 questions including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Results: Responses were received from 109 participants. The majority (90%) were aware of potential hazards and highlighted a desire for better protective measures (60%). A smoke evacuation system was frequently used with ablative lasers (66%) and fractional ablative lasers (61%), but less the case with non-ablative lasers (30%) and hair removal lasers (28%). The COVID-19 outbreak had no clear effect on the use of smoke evacuation systems. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly surgical masks were used (40-57%), while high filtration masks (FFP1, FFP2 or FFP3) were used by only a small percentage (15-30%). Post COVID-19 outbreak, the use of high filtration masks increased significantly (54-66%), predominately due to an increase in the use of FFP2 masks. Reasons mentioned for inadequate protective measures were sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, high room temperatures, and financial costs. Conclusion: While there is considerable awareness of the hazards of laser-induced smoke among physicians and laser operators, a substantial number of them do not use appropriate protective measures. The implementation of regulations on safety measures is hampered by sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, financial issues, and high room temperatures.

AB - Introduction: Inhalation of laser-induced smoke is a potential health hazard to exposed physicians and laser operators. To date, little is known about the perception of health hazards related to laser-induced smoke exposure among physicians and the actual use of safety measures to mitigate these risks. Methods: In May 2020, 514 members of the European Society for Lasers and Energy-Based Devices (ESLD) were invited by email to participate in an online survey. The survey comprised 16 questions including multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Results: Responses were received from 109 participants. The majority (90%) were aware of potential hazards and highlighted a desire for better protective measures (60%). A smoke evacuation system was frequently used with ablative lasers (66%) and fractional ablative lasers (61%), but less the case with non-ablative lasers (30%) and hair removal lasers (28%). The COVID-19 outbreak had no clear effect on the use of smoke evacuation systems. Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, mainly surgical masks were used (40-57%), while high filtration masks (FFP1, FFP2 or FFP3) were used by only a small percentage (15-30%). Post COVID-19 outbreak, the use of high filtration masks increased significantly (54-66%), predominately due to an increase in the use of FFP2 masks. Reasons mentioned for inadequate protective measures were sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, high room temperatures, and financial costs. Conclusion: While there is considerable awareness of the hazards of laser-induced smoke among physicians and laser operators, a substantial number of them do not use appropriate protective measures. The implementation of regulations on safety measures is hampered by sparse knowledge, limited availability, discomfort, excessive noise, financial issues, and high room temperatures.

KW - Health hazards

KW - Laser-induced smoke

KW - Protective measures

KW - Surgical smoke

U2 - 10.34172/jlms.2022.63

DO - 10.34172/jlms.2022.63

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37041772

AN - SCOPUS:85147745881

VL - 13

JO - Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences

JF - Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences

SN - 2008-9783

M1 - e63

ER -

ID: 342564892