TY - JOUR

T1 - Morphometric Optical Imaging of Microporated Nail Tissue

T2 - An Investigation of Intermethod Agreement, Reliability, and Technical Limitations

AU - Ortner, Vinzent K.

AU - Holmes, Jon

AU - Haedersdal, Merete

AU - Philipsen, Peter A.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background and Objectives: While optical imaging is a useful technique to quantitate morphological differences and treatment effects, comparative investigations of the various techniques are lacking. This study aimed at evaluating intermethod agreement, reliability, and technical limitations of wide-field microscopy (WFM), reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for morphometry by assessing fractionally ablated nail tissue. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Fifty healthy nail clippings were processed with a fractionated CO2-laser (20 mJ/microbeam, density 15%), measured with calipers, and imaged using WFM, OCT, and RCM. Images were assessed for nail plate thickness, micropore dimensions, degree of poration, and artifacts. Repeated measurements (2–5) were taken to evaluate method repeatability using Cronbach's α and coefficients of variation (CoV), and estimate the intermethod correlation through linear correlation assessment (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC]), ranked correlation (Kendall's tau; tau-c), and intraclass correlation (Shrout-Fleiss reliability coefficient; ICC). Results: The repeatability varied substantially between methods and target measurements. The level of intermethod agreement for thickness measurements performed with calipers, WFM, and OCT was high (tau-c ≥ 0.7; ICC ≥ 0.8; PCC ≥ 0.9). RCM could only image 28 out of 50 samples due to its limited penetration depth. OCT demonstrated the highest repeatability of all imaging techniques (CoV 4–7%) and nail thickness showed the highest measurement reliability (α = 0.92). Micropore dimensions correlated strongest between OCT and RCM (tau-c/ICC/PCC ≥ 0.5). All modalities were prone to artifacts, which may have adversely affected measurement variation and intermethod agreement. Conclusion: Intermethod agreement and reliability appear to be highly dependent on the specific modality and target measurement. To reap the benefits of each technique while mitigating their limitations, an integrated approach to optical imaging is recommended. Lasers Surg. Med.

AB - Background and Objectives: While optical imaging is a useful technique to quantitate morphological differences and treatment effects, comparative investigations of the various techniques are lacking. This study aimed at evaluating intermethod agreement, reliability, and technical limitations of wide-field microscopy (WFM), reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) for morphometry by assessing fractionally ablated nail tissue. Study Design/Materials and Methods: Fifty healthy nail clippings were processed with a fractionated CO2-laser (20 mJ/microbeam, density 15%), measured with calipers, and imaged using WFM, OCT, and RCM. Images were assessed for nail plate thickness, micropore dimensions, degree of poration, and artifacts. Repeated measurements (2–5) were taken to evaluate method repeatability using Cronbach's α and coefficients of variation (CoV), and estimate the intermethod correlation through linear correlation assessment (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC]), ranked correlation (Kendall's tau; tau-c), and intraclass correlation (Shrout-Fleiss reliability coefficient; ICC). Results: The repeatability varied substantially between methods and target measurements. The level of intermethod agreement for thickness measurements performed with calipers, WFM, and OCT was high (tau-c ≥ 0.7; ICC ≥ 0.8; PCC ≥ 0.9). RCM could only image 28 out of 50 samples due to its limited penetration depth. OCT demonstrated the highest repeatability of all imaging techniques (CoV 4–7%) and nail thickness showed the highest measurement reliability (α = 0.92). Micropore dimensions correlated strongest between OCT and RCM (tau-c/ICC/PCC ≥ 0.5). All modalities were prone to artifacts, which may have adversely affected measurement variation and intermethod agreement. Conclusion: Intermethod agreement and reliability appear to be highly dependent on the specific modality and target measurement. To reap the benefits of each technique while mitigating their limitations, an integrated approach to optical imaging is recommended. Lasers Surg. Med.

KW - intermethod agreement

KW - laser ablation

KW - nail

KW - noninvasive imaging

U2 - 10.1002/lsm.23304

DO - 10.1002/lsm.23304

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32770696

AN - SCOPUS:85089087134

VL - 53

SP - 838

EP - 848

JO - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

JF - Lasers in Surgery and Medicine

SN - 0196-8092

IS - 6

ER -