TY - JOUR

T1 - Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 vs. Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus

AU - Vestergaard, Lau K.

AU - Oliveira, Douglas N.P.

AU - Poulsen, Tim S.

AU - Høgdall, Claus K.

AU - Høgdall, Estrid V.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - The usage of next generation sequencing in combination with targeted gene panels has enforced a better understanding of tumor compositions. The identification of key genomic bi-omarkers underlying a disease are crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapeutic re-sponses. The Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) covers 161 cancer‐associated genes and is routinely employed to support clinical decision making for a therapeutic course. An improved version, Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA‐Plus), has been recently developed, covering 501 genes (144 overlapping with OCAv3) in addition to microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) assays in one workflow. The validation of MSI and TMB was not addressed in the present study. However, the implementation of new assays must be validated and confirmed across multiple samples before it can be introduced into a clinical setting. Here, we report the comparison of DNA sequencing results from 50 ovarian cancer formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embed-ded samples subjected to OCAv3 and OCA‐Plus. A validation assessment of gene mutations identified using OCA‐Plus was performed on the 144 overlapping genes and 313,769 intersecting nucle-otide positions of the OCAv3 and the OCA‐Plus. Our results showed a 91% concordance within variants classified as likely‐pathogenic or pathogenic. Moreover, results showed that a region of PTEN is poorly covered by the OCA‐Plus assay, hence, we implemented rescue filters for those variants. In conclusion, the OCA‐Plus can reflect the mutational profile of genomic variants com-pared with OCAv3 of 144 overlapping genes, without compromising performance.

AB - The usage of next generation sequencing in combination with targeted gene panels has enforced a better understanding of tumor compositions. The identification of key genomic bi-omarkers underlying a disease are crucial for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and therapeutic re-sponses. The Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay v3 (OCAv3) covers 161 cancer‐associated genes and is routinely employed to support clinical decision making for a therapeutic course. An improved version, Oncomine™ Comprehensive Assay Plus (OCA‐Plus), has been recently developed, covering 501 genes (144 overlapping with OCAv3) in addition to microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) assays in one workflow. The validation of MSI and TMB was not addressed in the present study. However, the implementation of new assays must be validated and confirmed across multiple samples before it can be introduced into a clinical setting. Here, we report the comparison of DNA sequencing results from 50 ovarian cancer formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embed-ded samples subjected to OCAv3 and OCA‐Plus. A validation assessment of gene mutations identified using OCA‐Plus was performed on the 144 overlapping genes and 313,769 intersecting nucle-otide positions of the OCAv3 and the OCA‐Plus. Our results showed a 91% concordance within variants classified as likely‐pathogenic or pathogenic. Moreover, results showed that a region of PTEN is poorly covered by the OCA‐Plus assay, hence, we implemented rescue filters for those variants. In conclusion, the OCA‐Plus can reflect the mutational profile of genomic variants com-pared with OCAv3 of 144 overlapping genes, without compromising performance.

KW - Biomarker discovery

KW - Clinical research

KW - Genomic profiling

KW - Oncomine comprehensive assay plus

KW - Oncomine comprehensive assay v3

KW - Targeted NGS

U2 - 10.3390/cancers13205230

DO - 10.3390/cancers13205230

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34680378

AN - SCOPUS:85117134025

VL - 13

JO - Cancers

JF - Cancers

SN - 2072-6694

IS - 20

M1 - 5230

ER -