Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial. / Antonsen, Sofie L; Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest; Lundvall, Lene; Høgdall, Claus Kim.

I: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, Bind 90, Nr. 1, 01.01.2011, s. 72-6.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Antonsen, SL, Meyhoff, CS, Lundvall, L & Høgdall, CK 2011, 'Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial', Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, bind 90, nr. 1, s. 72-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x

APA

Antonsen, S. L., Meyhoff, C. S., Lundvall, L., & Høgdall, C. K. (2011). Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 90(1), 72-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x

Vancouver

Antonsen SL, Meyhoff CS, Lundvall L, Høgdall CK. Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011 jan. 1;90(1):72-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x

Author

Antonsen, Sofie L ; Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest ; Lundvall, Lene ; Høgdall, Claus Kim. / Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial. I: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 2011 ; Bind 90, Nr. 1. s. 72-6.

Bibtex

@article{fd6bc209e6404557b07fa81466135b92,
title = "Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Surgical-site infections are serious complications and thorough follow-up is important for accurate surveillance. We aimed to compare the frequency of complications recorded in a clinical quality database with those noted in a randomized clinical trial with follow-up visits.DESIGN: Evaluation study.SETTING: Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) and the Danish multicenter trial on perioperative oxygen and surgical-site infections (PROXI).SAMPLE: Paired data from 222 patients who participated in the PROXI trial taking place at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet between November 2006 and October 2008 and data from the DGCD.METHODS: Outcomes within 30 days from the trial and the database were compared and levels of agreements were calculated with kappa-statistics.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was surgical-site infection. Other outcomes included re-operation, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and sepsis.RESULTS: Surgical-site infection was found in 21 of 222 patients (9.5%) in the PROXI trial versus 6 of 222 patients (2.7%) in the DGCD (p < 0.01, kappa 0.42). Twelve of 15 superficial and three of six deep or organ-space surgical-site infections were registered in the PROXI trial, but not in the DGCD. Agreements between secondary outcomes were very varying (kappa-value 0.77 for re-operation, 0.37 for urinary tract infections, 0.19 for sepsis and 0.18 for pneumonia).CONCLUSIONS: The randomized trial reported significantly more surgical-site infections than the clinical database. The DGCD reported only 50% of the deep and organ-space infections, and hence, the low-overall agreement indicates a need for more careful database registration.",
author = "Antonsen, {Sofie L} and Meyhoff, {Christian Sylvest} and Lene Lundvall and H{\o}gdall, {Claus Kim}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2010 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica{\textcopyright} 2010 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.",
year = "2011",
month = jan,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x",
language = "English",
volume = "90",
pages = "72--6",
journal = "Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0001-6349",
publisher = "JohnWiley & Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Surgical-site infections and postoperative complications: agreement between the Danish Gynecological Cancer Database and a randomized clinical trial

AU - Antonsen, Sofie L

AU - Meyhoff, Christian Sylvest

AU - Lundvall, Lene

AU - Høgdall, Claus Kim

N1 - © 2010 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica© 2010 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Surgical-site infections are serious complications and thorough follow-up is important for accurate surveillance. We aimed to compare the frequency of complications recorded in a clinical quality database with those noted in a randomized clinical trial with follow-up visits.DESIGN: Evaluation study.SETTING: Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) and the Danish multicenter trial on perioperative oxygen and surgical-site infections (PROXI).SAMPLE: Paired data from 222 patients who participated in the PROXI trial taking place at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet between November 2006 and October 2008 and data from the DGCD.METHODS: Outcomes within 30 days from the trial and the database were compared and levels of agreements were calculated with kappa-statistics.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was surgical-site infection. Other outcomes included re-operation, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and sepsis.RESULTS: Surgical-site infection was found in 21 of 222 patients (9.5%) in the PROXI trial versus 6 of 222 patients (2.7%) in the DGCD (p < 0.01, kappa 0.42). Twelve of 15 superficial and three of six deep or organ-space surgical-site infections were registered in the PROXI trial, but not in the DGCD. Agreements between secondary outcomes were very varying (kappa-value 0.77 for re-operation, 0.37 for urinary tract infections, 0.19 for sepsis and 0.18 for pneumonia).CONCLUSIONS: The randomized trial reported significantly more surgical-site infections than the clinical database. The DGCD reported only 50% of the deep and organ-space infections, and hence, the low-overall agreement indicates a need for more careful database registration.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Surgical-site infections are serious complications and thorough follow-up is important for accurate surveillance. We aimed to compare the frequency of complications recorded in a clinical quality database with those noted in a randomized clinical trial with follow-up visits.DESIGN: Evaluation study.SETTING: Danish Gynecological Cancer Database (DGCD) and the Danish multicenter trial on perioperative oxygen and surgical-site infections (PROXI).SAMPLE: Paired data from 222 patients who participated in the PROXI trial taking place at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet between November 2006 and October 2008 and data from the DGCD.METHODS: Outcomes within 30 days from the trial and the database were compared and levels of agreements were calculated with kappa-statistics.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was surgical-site infection. Other outcomes included re-operation, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and sepsis.RESULTS: Surgical-site infection was found in 21 of 222 patients (9.5%) in the PROXI trial versus 6 of 222 patients (2.7%) in the DGCD (p < 0.01, kappa 0.42). Twelve of 15 superficial and three of six deep or organ-space surgical-site infections were registered in the PROXI trial, but not in the DGCD. Agreements between secondary outcomes were very varying (kappa-value 0.77 for re-operation, 0.37 for urinary tract infections, 0.19 for sepsis and 0.18 for pneumonia).CONCLUSIONS: The randomized trial reported significantly more surgical-site infections than the clinical database. The DGCD reported only 50% of the deep and organ-space infections, and hence, the low-overall agreement indicates a need for more careful database registration.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2010.01007.x

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21275918

VL - 90

SP - 72

EP - 76

JO - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

SN - 0001-6349

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 34133764