Biological treatment of Crohn's disease

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Biological treatment of Crohn's disease. / Nielsen, Ole Haagen; Bjerrum, Jacob Tveiten; Seidelin, Jakob Benedict; Nyberg, Caroline; Ainsworth, Mark.

I: Digestive Diseases, Bind 30 Suppl 3, 2012, s. 121-33.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Nielsen, OH, Bjerrum, JT, Seidelin, JB, Nyberg, C & Ainsworth, M 2012, 'Biological treatment of Crohn's disease', Digestive Diseases, bind 30 Suppl 3, s. 121-33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342738

APA

Nielsen, O. H., Bjerrum, J. T., Seidelin, J. B., Nyberg, C., & Ainsworth, M. (2012). Biological treatment of Crohn's disease. Digestive Diseases, 30 Suppl 3, 121-33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342738

Vancouver

Nielsen OH, Bjerrum JT, Seidelin JB, Nyberg C, Ainsworth M. Biological treatment of Crohn's disease. Digestive Diseases. 2012;30 Suppl 3:121-33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342738

Author

Nielsen, Ole Haagen ; Bjerrum, Jacob Tveiten ; Seidelin, Jakob Benedict ; Nyberg, Caroline ; Ainsworth, Mark. / Biological treatment of Crohn's disease. I: Digestive Diseases. 2012 ; Bind 30 Suppl 3. s. 121-33.

Bibtex

@article{d64fe19e1b74421b9e8f978699fe51eb,
title = "Biological treatment of Crohn's disease",
abstract = "Introduction of biological agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) has led to a transformation of the treatment paradigm. Several biological compounds have been approved for patients with CD refractory to conventional treatment: infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol (and natalizumab in several countries outside the European Union). However, despite the use of biologics for more than a decade, questions still remain about the true efficacy and the best treatment regimens - especially about when to discontinue treatment. Furthermore, a need for optimizing treatment with biologics still exists, as 20-40% of patients with CD (depending on selection criteria) do not have any relevant response to the current biological agents (i.e. primary failures). A better patient selection might maximize the clinical outcome while minimizing the complications associated with this type of therapy. However, the clinical tools capable of identifying such patients are still unavailable, and the trough level strategy may help the clinician to optimize therapy and to avoid loss of response and/or immunogenicity (i.e. a low but measurable antibody level exists just before the periodic administration of the biological agent). On the other hand, peak levels and average levels should not exceed concentrations associated with increased toxicity. Randomized, controlled studies focusing on trough levels and antibodies towards the biological agent in routine clinical situations may add important pieces to the puzzle for a more rational treatment algorithm of CD patients. In some situations, the risks (i.e. immunogenicity, serious infections and the promotion of neoplasia) may, however, not outweigh the benefits of biological treatment.",
author = "Nielsen, {Ole Haagen} and Bjerrum, {Jacob Tveiten} and Seidelin, {Jakob Benedict} and Caroline Nyberg and Mark Ainsworth",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1159/000342738",
language = "English",
volume = "30 Suppl 3",
pages = "121--33",
journal = "Digestive Diseases",
issn = "0257-2753",
publisher = "S Karger AG",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biological treatment of Crohn's disease

AU - Nielsen, Ole Haagen

AU - Bjerrum, Jacob Tveiten

AU - Seidelin, Jakob Benedict

AU - Nyberg, Caroline

AU - Ainsworth, Mark

N1 - Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Introduction of biological agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) has led to a transformation of the treatment paradigm. Several biological compounds have been approved for patients with CD refractory to conventional treatment: infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol (and natalizumab in several countries outside the European Union). However, despite the use of biologics for more than a decade, questions still remain about the true efficacy and the best treatment regimens - especially about when to discontinue treatment. Furthermore, a need for optimizing treatment with biologics still exists, as 20-40% of patients with CD (depending on selection criteria) do not have any relevant response to the current biological agents (i.e. primary failures). A better patient selection might maximize the clinical outcome while minimizing the complications associated with this type of therapy. However, the clinical tools capable of identifying such patients are still unavailable, and the trough level strategy may help the clinician to optimize therapy and to avoid loss of response and/or immunogenicity (i.e. a low but measurable antibody level exists just before the periodic administration of the biological agent). On the other hand, peak levels and average levels should not exceed concentrations associated with increased toxicity. Randomized, controlled studies focusing on trough levels and antibodies towards the biological agent in routine clinical situations may add important pieces to the puzzle for a more rational treatment algorithm of CD patients. In some situations, the risks (i.e. immunogenicity, serious infections and the promotion of neoplasia) may, however, not outweigh the benefits of biological treatment.

AB - Introduction of biological agents for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) has led to a transformation of the treatment paradigm. Several biological compounds have been approved for patients with CD refractory to conventional treatment: infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol (and natalizumab in several countries outside the European Union). However, despite the use of biologics for more than a decade, questions still remain about the true efficacy and the best treatment regimens - especially about when to discontinue treatment. Furthermore, a need for optimizing treatment with biologics still exists, as 20-40% of patients with CD (depending on selection criteria) do not have any relevant response to the current biological agents (i.e. primary failures). A better patient selection might maximize the clinical outcome while minimizing the complications associated with this type of therapy. However, the clinical tools capable of identifying such patients are still unavailable, and the trough level strategy may help the clinician to optimize therapy and to avoid loss of response and/or immunogenicity (i.e. a low but measurable antibody level exists just before the periodic administration of the biological agent). On the other hand, peak levels and average levels should not exceed concentrations associated with increased toxicity. Randomized, controlled studies focusing on trough levels and antibodies towards the biological agent in routine clinical situations may add important pieces to the puzzle for a more rational treatment algorithm of CD patients. In some situations, the risks (i.e. immunogenicity, serious infections and the promotion of neoplasia) may, however, not outweigh the benefits of biological treatment.

U2 - 10.1159/000342738

DO - 10.1159/000342738

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 23295703

VL - 30 Suppl 3

SP - 121

EP - 133

JO - Digestive Diseases

JF - Digestive Diseases

SN - 0257-2753

ER -

ID: 48414712