Low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol versus azathioprine monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (AAUC): An investigator-initiated, open, multicenter, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 318 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Marianne Kiszka-Kanowitz
  • Klaus Theede
  • Sandra Bohn Thomsen
  • Bjerrum, Jacob Wium
  • Jørn Brynskov
  • Ida Benedikte Gottschalck
  • Elena Akimenko
  • Karen Lisa Hilsted
  • Anders Neumann
  • Signe Wildt
  • Lone Larsen
  • Jens Kristian Munk
  • Ibsen, Per Holger
  • Huma Gul Rehana Janjua
  • Gluud, Lise Lotte
  • Anette Mertz-Nielsen

Background: Retrospective studies suggest that for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) combination therapy with low-dose azathioprine and allopurinol (L-AZA/ALLO) may result in higher remission rates than monotherapy with azathioprine (AZA). We prospectively investigated the effects of these drugs for remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. Methods: Open-label, unblinded, randomised, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicentre study conducted at eight hospital sites in Denmark. Adult patients with established UC, who were steroid dependent/refractory, thiopurine naïve, had a normal thiopurine methyltransferase, and achieved remission with steroids or infliximab were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned by the investigators (1:1) to 52 weeks of treatment with once daily oral AZA (median dose 50 mg) combined with ALLO 100 mg versus AZA monotherapy (median dose 200 mg), using a computer-generated randomisation list with blocks of six. The trial was open without masking. All randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in primary and safety analyses (intention to treat population). The primary outcome was steroid and infliximab free remission after 52 weeks, defined as a Mayo Score of ≤1 and no rectal bleeding. The trial is completed and is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03101800). Findings: Between January 9, 2017 and February 10, 2021, 47 patients were randomised to L-AZA/ALLO and 42 to AZA and received at least one dose of the study drug. After 52 weeks, 20 of 47 (43%) patients in the L-AZA/ALLO group and nine of 42 (21%) patients in the AZA group achieved remission (odds ratio 2·54 [95% CI 1·00 to 6.78, p < 0·048]). Fourteen patients (30%) in the L-AZA/ALLO group and 16 (38%) in the AZA group were withdrawn from the study due to adverse events. Interpretation: This study suggests that after one year L-AZA/ALLO therapy may be associated with a beneficial effect on steroid- and infliximab-free clinical remission in patients with moderate-to-severe UC and should be considered as first line therapy. Funding: Funding for AAUC was provided by The Capital Region of Denmark (Regionernes Medicinpulje (6062/16)).

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer101332
TidsskriftEClinicalMedicine
Vol/bind45
Antal sider9
ISSN2589-5370
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
MKK, LLG, EA, IBG, LL, JTB, JKM, KLH, AN, PHI, and HGRJ: none. AMN, SBT: Has received a grant from The Regions Medicinepulje to conduct the study. SW: Has received personal fees from Takeda and Tillotts outside the submitted work. JB: Has been a consultant and/or received advisory board fees and/or research grants from Abbvie, MSD, Takeda, Janssen, Pfizer, Bristol Myers Squibb and Gilead. KT: Has received personal fees from Ferring Lægemidler A/S, Takeda, Tillotts and Pfizer outside the submitted work. AN: Has received grants from Pharmacosmos and non-financial support from Janssen and Takeda, outside the submitted work.

Funding Information:
The Capital Regions of Denmark (Regions Medicinpulje (6062/16)). The AAUC group will evaluate proposals submitted by qualified researchers to the corresponding author.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors

ID: 313868441