Extended Right-Sided Colon Resection Does Not Reduce the Risk of Colon Cancer Local-Regional Recurrence: Nationwide Population-Based Study From Danish Colorectal Cancer Group Database

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Alaa El-Hussuna
  • Theodore Lytras
  • Niels Henrik Bruun
  • Klein, Mads Falk
  • Sameh Hany Emile
  • Niels Qvist
BACKGROUND:
It is controversial whether extensive resection of right-sided colon cancer confers oncological benefits.

OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes of extended surgical removal of the mesocolon compared to the conventional approach.

DESIGN:
This was a retrospective population-based study.

SETTING:
Study is based on a prospectively maintained Danish Colorectal Cancer Group database.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:
Primary outcome measures included local-regional recurrence in patients who underwent curative resection for right-sided colon cancer and 30-day postoperative complications. Distant metastasis, unplanned intraoperative adverse events, and 30- and 90-day postoperative mortality were also investigated. Patients who had palliative or compromised resection, emergency surgery, or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded.

RESULTS:
Of the 12,855 patients with resection of right-sided colon cancer retrieved, 1151 underwent extended right hemicolectomy. Patients who had extended right hemicolectomy were younger males with lower ASA scores, were operated on by colorectal surgeons using a laparoscopic approach, and had a significantly higher number of harvested lymph nodes. The rate of local-regional recurrence was 1.1% (136/12,855), with no difference between conventional right hemicolectomy and extended right hemicolectomy (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.63–2.18). Postoperative medical complications were significantly higher in extended right hemicolectomy even after adjusting for age, comorbidity, access to the abdomen, and other covariates (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01–1.58). No significant difference was noticed between conventional right hemicolectomy and extended right hemicolectomy in the rates of distant metastasis, unplanned intraoperative adverse events, and mortality.

LIMITATIONS:
Because it is a register-based study, underreporting cannot be excluded. Extended right hemicolectomy, as defined in this study, does not reflect the extent of lymphatic dissection performed during the surgery.

CONCLUSIONS:
This large population-based register study showed no difference in local-regional recurrence of right-sided colon cancer between conventional and extended right hemicolectomy with mesenteric resection and ligation of the middle colic vessels. Extended resection was associated with higher rates of postoperative complications. See Video Abstract at https://links.lww.com/DCR/B907.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDiseases of the Colon and Rectum
Vol/bind66
Udgave nummer8
Sider (fra-til)1056-1066
Antal sider11
ISSN0012-3706
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2023

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The ASCRS.

ID: 365876128