Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients. / Baker, Mariwan; Juhler-Nøttrup, Trine; Behrens, Claus F.

I: Women's Health, Bind 10, Nr. 6, 11.2014, s. 583-590.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Baker, M, Juhler-Nøttrup, T & Behrens, CF 2014, 'Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients', Women's Health, bind 10, nr. 6, s. 583-590. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.14.49

APA

Baker, M., Juhler-Nøttrup, T., & Behrens, C. F. (2014). Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients. Women's Health, 10(6), 583-590. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.14.49

Vancouver

Baker M, Juhler-Nøttrup T, Behrens CF. Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients. Women's Health. 2014 nov.;10(6):583-590. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.14.49

Author

Baker, Mariwan ; Juhler-Nøttrup, Trine ; Behrens, Claus F. / Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients. I: Women's Health. 2014 ; Bind 10, Nr. 6. s. 583-590.

Bibtex

@article{f3d05fb68fc64bc7ad3cef116522ff58,
title = "Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients",
abstract = "AIM: The aim of this study was to quantify the uterine positional displacement induced by ultrasound probe pressure on a phantom and address the daily uterine motion in a healthy volunteer.MATERIALS & METHODS: The phantom mimics the female pelvic region. The incorporated organs were subjected to displacement. A total of 42 phantom scans and 16 volunteer scans were acquired. The uterine shifts were measured in three directions.RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The difference of uterine positional displacements, using pressure versus without pressure on the phantom, was not statistically significant. The daily uterine positional variations of the volunteer were larger than the probe pressure induced displacements.CONCLUSION: The larger daily uterine shifts of the volunteer outweighed the submillimeter impact of the probe pressure in all directions.",
author = "Mariwan Baker and Trine Juhler-N{\o}ttrup and Behrens, {Claus F}",
year = "2014",
month = nov,
doi = "10.2217/whe.14.49",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "583--590",
journal = "Women's Health",
issn = "1745-5057",
publisher = "Future Medicine Ltd.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impact of ultrasound probe pressure on uterine positional displacement in gynecologic cancer patients

AU - Baker, Mariwan

AU - Juhler-Nøttrup, Trine

AU - Behrens, Claus F

PY - 2014/11

Y1 - 2014/11

N2 - AIM: The aim of this study was to quantify the uterine positional displacement induced by ultrasound probe pressure on a phantom and address the daily uterine motion in a healthy volunteer.MATERIALS & METHODS: The phantom mimics the female pelvic region. The incorporated organs were subjected to displacement. A total of 42 phantom scans and 16 volunteer scans were acquired. The uterine shifts were measured in three directions.RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The difference of uterine positional displacements, using pressure versus without pressure on the phantom, was not statistically significant. The daily uterine positional variations of the volunteer were larger than the probe pressure induced displacements.CONCLUSION: The larger daily uterine shifts of the volunteer outweighed the submillimeter impact of the probe pressure in all directions.

AB - AIM: The aim of this study was to quantify the uterine positional displacement induced by ultrasound probe pressure on a phantom and address the daily uterine motion in a healthy volunteer.MATERIALS & METHODS: The phantom mimics the female pelvic region. The incorporated organs were subjected to displacement. A total of 42 phantom scans and 16 volunteer scans were acquired. The uterine shifts were measured in three directions.RESULTS & DISCUSSION: The difference of uterine positional displacements, using pressure versus without pressure on the phantom, was not statistically significant. The daily uterine positional variations of the volunteer were larger than the probe pressure induced displacements.CONCLUSION: The larger daily uterine shifts of the volunteer outweighed the submillimeter impact of the probe pressure in all directions.

U2 - 10.2217/whe.14.49

DO - 10.2217/whe.14.49

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25482485

VL - 10

SP - 583

EP - 590

JO - Women's Health

JF - Women's Health

SN - 1745-5057

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 135226846