Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort. / Zibrandtsen, Ivan C.; Kjaer, Troels W.

I: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, Bind 6, 2021, s. 1-9.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Zibrandtsen, IC & Kjaer, TW 2021, 'Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort', Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, bind 6, s. 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001

APA

Zibrandtsen, I. C., & Kjaer, T. W. (2021). Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice, 6, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001

Vancouver

Zibrandtsen IC, Kjaer TW. Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort. Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. 2021;6:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001

Author

Zibrandtsen, Ivan C. ; Kjaer, Troels W. / Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort. I: Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. 2021 ; Bind 6. s. 1-9.

Bibtex

@article{18c1521b97994dc5bf92871abcf9fef7,
title = "Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort",
abstract = "Objective: To develop and test a fully automated method for estimation of the peak frequency of the posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) in a large retrospective EEG cohort. Methods: Thresholding was used to select suitable EEG data segments for spectral estimation for electrode O1 and O2. A random sample of 100 peak frequency estimates were blindly rated by two independent raters to validate the results of the automatic PDR peak frequency estimates. We investigated the relationship with age, sex and binary EEG classification. Results: There were 9197 eligible EEGs which resulted in a total of 6104 PDR peak frequency estimates. The relationship between automatic estimates and age was found to be consistent with the literature. The correlation between human ratings and automatic scoring was very high, rho = 0.94–0.95. There was a sex difference of d = 0.33 emerging at puberty with females having a faster PDR peak frequency than males. Conclusions: Fully automatic PDR peak frequency estimation not dependent on annotated EEG produced results that are very close to human ratings. Significance: PDR peak frequency can be automatically estimated. A compiled version of the algorithm is included as an app for independent use.",
keywords = "App, Automation, EEG, Posterior dominant rhythm, Spectral estimation",
author = "Zibrandtsen, {Ivan C.} and Kjaer, {Troels W.}",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Clinical Neurophysiology Practice",
issn = "2467-981X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fully automatic peak frequency estimation of the posterior dominant rhythm in a large retrospective hospital EEG cohort

AU - Zibrandtsen, Ivan C.

AU - Kjaer, Troels W.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Objective: To develop and test a fully automated method for estimation of the peak frequency of the posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) in a large retrospective EEG cohort. Methods: Thresholding was used to select suitable EEG data segments for spectral estimation for electrode O1 and O2. A random sample of 100 peak frequency estimates were blindly rated by two independent raters to validate the results of the automatic PDR peak frequency estimates. We investigated the relationship with age, sex and binary EEG classification. Results: There were 9197 eligible EEGs which resulted in a total of 6104 PDR peak frequency estimates. The relationship between automatic estimates and age was found to be consistent with the literature. The correlation between human ratings and automatic scoring was very high, rho = 0.94–0.95. There was a sex difference of d = 0.33 emerging at puberty with females having a faster PDR peak frequency than males. Conclusions: Fully automatic PDR peak frequency estimation not dependent on annotated EEG produced results that are very close to human ratings. Significance: PDR peak frequency can be automatically estimated. A compiled version of the algorithm is included as an app for independent use.

AB - Objective: To develop and test a fully automated method for estimation of the peak frequency of the posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) in a large retrospective EEG cohort. Methods: Thresholding was used to select suitable EEG data segments for spectral estimation for electrode O1 and O2. A random sample of 100 peak frequency estimates were blindly rated by two independent raters to validate the results of the automatic PDR peak frequency estimates. We investigated the relationship with age, sex and binary EEG classification. Results: There were 9197 eligible EEGs which resulted in a total of 6104 PDR peak frequency estimates. The relationship between automatic estimates and age was found to be consistent with the literature. The correlation between human ratings and automatic scoring was very high, rho = 0.94–0.95. There was a sex difference of d = 0.33 emerging at puberty with females having a faster PDR peak frequency than males. Conclusions: Fully automatic PDR peak frequency estimation not dependent on annotated EEG produced results that are very close to human ratings. Significance: PDR peak frequency can be automatically estimated. A compiled version of the algorithm is included as an app for independent use.

KW - App

KW - Automation

KW - EEG

KW - Posterior dominant rhythm

KW - Spectral estimation

U2 - 10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.cnp.2020.11.001

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33385100

AN - SCOPUS:85098794083

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

JF - Clinical Neurophysiology Practice

SN - 2467-981X

ER -

ID: 254991006