Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study. / Waldorff, Frans Boch; Rishøj, Susanne; Waldemar, Gunhild.

I: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, Bind 23, Nr. 4, 2005, s. 221-6.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Waldorff, FB, Rishøj, S & Waldemar, G 2005, 'Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study', Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, bind 23, nr. 4, s. 221-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430510031324

APA

Waldorff, F. B., Rishøj, S., & Waldemar, G. (2005). Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 23(4), 221-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430510031324

Vancouver

Waldorff FB, Rishøj S, Waldemar G. Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2005;23(4):221-6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02813430510031324

Author

Waldorff, Frans Boch ; Rishøj, Susanne ; Waldemar, Gunhild. / Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study. I: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 2005 ; Bind 23, Nr. 4. s. 221-6.

Bibtex

@article{818f8dc0f2c911ddbf70000ea68e967b,
title = "Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, and to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. DESIGN: A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, and a follow-up study. SETTING: In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. SUBJECTS: A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October and November 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MMSE score < or = 23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs and referral status after 6 months, and follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, and 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). CONCLUSION: In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months.",
author = "Waldorff, {Frans Boch} and Susanne Rish{\o}j and Gunhild Waldemar",
note = "Keywords: Aged; Dementia; Family Practice; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mental Status Schedule; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Questionnaires; Referral and Consultation",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1080/02813430510031324",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "221--6",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care",
issn = "0281-3432",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identification and diagnostic evaluation of possible dementia in general practice. A prospective study

AU - Waldorff, Frans Boch

AU - Rishøj, Susanne

AU - Waldemar, Gunhild

N1 - Keywords: Aged; Dementia; Family Practice; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Mental Status Schedule; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Questionnaires; Referral and Consultation

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, and to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. DESIGN: A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, and a follow-up study. SETTING: In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. SUBJECTS: A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October and November 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MMSE score < or = 23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs and referral status after 6 months, and follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, and 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). CONCLUSION: In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rate of diagnostic evaluation of dementia for patients in whom a suspicion of dementia was raised, and to investigate reasons why a diagnostic evaluation was not always being performed. DESIGN: A prospective study among elderly patients aged 65+, and a follow-up study. SETTING: In all, 17 general practices in Copenhagen with 40 865 patients on their lists of whom 2934 were aged 65+. SUBJECTS: A total of 793 patients consulting their GP regardless of reason of encounter, in October and November 2002. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: MMSE score < or = 23, GP clinical impression of dementia, laboratory-screening tests prescribed by the GPs and referral status after 6 months, and follow-up questionnaire. RESULTS: Of 793 patients a total of 138 patients were identified with possible dementia. Among the identified patients 26 (20%) were referred for further evaluation within 6 months, and 4 (3%) were treated for depression or referred for another condition. A total of 6 patients were lost to follow-up. In the remaining 102 undiagnosed patients the main reasons for not performing a diagnostic evaluation of dementia were patient/relative hesitation (34%), the GP thought that it would not have any consequences for the patient, or the GP estimated that the patient was too fragile (21%). CONCLUSION: In 17% of elderly patients in general practice a suspicion of dementia could be raised based on the clinical impression of the GP or MMSE score. However, only 23% of this group were evaluated by their GP or referred to a memory clinic within a subsequent period of 6 months.

U2 - 10.1080/02813430510031324

DO - 10.1080/02813430510031324

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 16272070

VL - 23

SP - 221

EP - 226

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

SN - 0281-3432

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 10146779