Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A MAGNIMS Study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome : A MAGNIMS Study. / MAGNIMS Study Grp.

I: Neurology, Bind 98, Nr. 1, 2022, s. E1-E14.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

MAGNIMS Study Grp 2022, 'Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A MAGNIMS Study', Neurology, bind 98, nr. 1, s. E1-E14. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

APA

MAGNIMS Study Grp (2022). Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A MAGNIMS Study. Neurology, 98(1), E1-E14. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

Vancouver

MAGNIMS Study Grp. Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A MAGNIMS Study. Neurology. 2022;98(1):E1-E14. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

Author

MAGNIMS Study Grp. / Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome : A MAGNIMS Study. I: Neurology. 2022 ; Bind 98, Nr. 1. s. E1-E14.

Bibtex

@article{ca5a0d87961742e8927c7c2499e04f90,
title = "Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome: A MAGNIMS Study",
abstract = "Background and Objectives To compare the performance of the 2017 revisions to the McDonald criteria with the 2010 McDonald criteria in establishing multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and predicting prognosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS. Methods CSF examination and brain and spinal cord MRI obtained = 3.0, if they occurred, were also collected. Performance of the 2017 and 2010 McDonald criteria for dissemination in space (DIS), dissemination in time (DIT) (including oligoclonal bands assessment), and DIS plus DIT for predicting a second clinical attack (clinically definite MS [CDMS]) and EDSS >= 3.0 at follow-up was evaluated. Time to MS diagnosis for the different criteria was also estimated. Results At follow-up (median 69.1 months), 406/785 patients with CIS developed CDMS. At 36 months, the 2017 DIS plus DIT criteria had higher sensitivity (0.83 vs 0.66), lower specificity (0.39 vs 0.60), and similar area under the curve values (0.61 vs 0.63). Median time to MS diagnosis was shorter with the 2017 vs the 2010 or CDMS criteria (2017 revision, 3.2; 2010 revision, 13.0; CDMS, 58.5 months). The 2 sets of criteria similarly predicted EDSS >= 3.0 milestone. Three periventricular lesions improved specificity in patients >= 45 years. Discussion The 2017 McDonald criteria showed higher sensitivity, lower specificity, and similar accuracy in predicting CDMS compared to 2010 McDonald criteria, while shortening time to diagnosis of MS. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that the 2017 McDonald Criteria more accurately distinguish CDMS in patients early after a CIS when compared to the 2010 McDonald criteria.",
keywords = "MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS DIAGNOSIS, SPINAL-CORD LESIONS, MRI CRITERIA, DISSEMINATION, CONVERSION, REVISIONS, RELEVANT, ADULTS, SPACE",
author = "Massimo Filippi and Paolo Preziosa and Alessandro Meani and {Dalla Costa}, Gloria and Sarlota Mesaros and Jelena Drulovic and Jovana Ivanovic and Alex Rovira and Mar Tintore and Xavier Montalban and Olga Ciccarelli and Wallace Brownlee and Katherine Miszkiel and Christian Enzinger and Michael Khalil and Frederik Barkhof and Strijbis, {Eva M. M.} and Frederiksen, {Jette L.} and Cramer, {Stig P.} and Enrico Fainardi and Amato, {Maria Pia} and Claudio Gasperini and Serena Ruggieri and Vittorio Martinelli and Giancarlo Comi and {MAGNIMS Study Grp}",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016",
language = "English",
volume = "98",
pages = "E1--E14",
journal = "Neurology",
issn = "0028-3878",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance of the 2017 and 2010 Revised McDonald Criteria in Predicting MS Diagnosis After a Clinically Isolated Syndrome

T2 - A MAGNIMS Study

AU - Filippi, Massimo

AU - Preziosa, Paolo

AU - Meani, Alessandro

AU - Dalla Costa, Gloria

AU - Mesaros, Sarlota

AU - Drulovic, Jelena

AU - Ivanovic, Jovana

AU - Rovira, Alex

AU - Tintore, Mar

AU - Montalban, Xavier

AU - Ciccarelli, Olga

AU - Brownlee, Wallace

AU - Miszkiel, Katherine

AU - Enzinger, Christian

AU - Khalil, Michael

AU - Barkhof, Frederik

AU - Strijbis, Eva M. M.

AU - Frederiksen, Jette L.

AU - Cramer, Stig P.

AU - Fainardi, Enrico

AU - Amato, Maria Pia

AU - Gasperini, Claudio

AU - Ruggieri, Serena

AU - Martinelli, Vittorio

AU - Comi, Giancarlo

AU - MAGNIMS Study Grp

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background and Objectives To compare the performance of the 2017 revisions to the McDonald criteria with the 2010 McDonald criteria in establishing multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and predicting prognosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS. Methods CSF examination and brain and spinal cord MRI obtained = 3.0, if they occurred, were also collected. Performance of the 2017 and 2010 McDonald criteria for dissemination in space (DIS), dissemination in time (DIT) (including oligoclonal bands assessment), and DIS plus DIT for predicting a second clinical attack (clinically definite MS [CDMS]) and EDSS >= 3.0 at follow-up was evaluated. Time to MS diagnosis for the different criteria was also estimated. Results At follow-up (median 69.1 months), 406/785 patients with CIS developed CDMS. At 36 months, the 2017 DIS plus DIT criteria had higher sensitivity (0.83 vs 0.66), lower specificity (0.39 vs 0.60), and similar area under the curve values (0.61 vs 0.63). Median time to MS diagnosis was shorter with the 2017 vs the 2010 or CDMS criteria (2017 revision, 3.2; 2010 revision, 13.0; CDMS, 58.5 months). The 2 sets of criteria similarly predicted EDSS >= 3.0 milestone. Three periventricular lesions improved specificity in patients >= 45 years. Discussion The 2017 McDonald criteria showed higher sensitivity, lower specificity, and similar accuracy in predicting CDMS compared to 2010 McDonald criteria, while shortening time to diagnosis of MS. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that the 2017 McDonald Criteria more accurately distinguish CDMS in patients early after a CIS when compared to the 2010 McDonald criteria.

AB - Background and Objectives To compare the performance of the 2017 revisions to the McDonald criteria with the 2010 McDonald criteria in establishing multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis and predicting prognosis in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS. Methods CSF examination and brain and spinal cord MRI obtained = 3.0, if they occurred, were also collected. Performance of the 2017 and 2010 McDonald criteria for dissemination in space (DIS), dissemination in time (DIT) (including oligoclonal bands assessment), and DIS plus DIT for predicting a second clinical attack (clinically definite MS [CDMS]) and EDSS >= 3.0 at follow-up was evaluated. Time to MS diagnosis for the different criteria was also estimated. Results At follow-up (median 69.1 months), 406/785 patients with CIS developed CDMS. At 36 months, the 2017 DIS plus DIT criteria had higher sensitivity (0.83 vs 0.66), lower specificity (0.39 vs 0.60), and similar area under the curve values (0.61 vs 0.63). Median time to MS diagnosis was shorter with the 2017 vs the 2010 or CDMS criteria (2017 revision, 3.2; 2010 revision, 13.0; CDMS, 58.5 months). The 2 sets of criteria similarly predicted EDSS >= 3.0 milestone. Three periventricular lesions improved specificity in patients >= 45 years. Discussion The 2017 McDonald criteria showed higher sensitivity, lower specificity, and similar accuracy in predicting CDMS compared to 2010 McDonald criteria, while shortening time to diagnosis of MS. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that the 2017 McDonald Criteria more accurately distinguish CDMS in patients early after a CIS when compared to the 2010 McDonald criteria.

KW - MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS DIAGNOSIS

KW - SPINAL-CORD LESIONS

KW - MRI CRITERIA

KW - DISSEMINATION

KW - CONVERSION

KW - REVISIONS

KW - RELEVANT

KW - ADULTS

KW - SPACE

U2 - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

DO - 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013016

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34716250

VL - 98

SP - E1-E14

JO - Neurology

JF - Neurology

SN - 0028-3878

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 290677533