Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Standard

Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. / Ravnborg, M; Blinkenberg, M; Sellebjerg, F; Ballegaard, M; Larsen, S Helweg; Sørensen, P Soelberg.

I: Multiple Sclerosis, Bind 11, Nr. 1, 2005, s. 81-4.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt

Harvard

Ravnborg, M, Blinkenberg, M, Sellebjerg, F, Ballegaard, M, Larsen, SH & Sørensen, PS 2005, 'Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale', Multiple Sclerosis, bind 11, nr. 1, s. 81-4.

APA

Ravnborg, M., Blinkenberg, M., Sellebjerg, F., Ballegaard, M., Larsen, S. H., & Sørensen, P. S. (2005). Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Multiple Sclerosis, 11(1), 81-4.

Vancouver

Ravnborg M, Blinkenberg M, Sellebjerg F, Ballegaard M, Larsen SH, Sørensen PS. Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Multiple Sclerosis. 2005;11(1):81-4.

Author

Ravnborg, M ; Blinkenberg, M ; Sellebjerg, F ; Ballegaard, M ; Larsen, S Helweg ; Sørensen, P Soelberg. / Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale. I: Multiple Sclerosis. 2005 ; Bind 11, Nr. 1. s. 81-4.

Bibtex

@article{7c07029ec1db4a0284b91d168311b9b8,
title = "Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale",
abstract = "The Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale (MSIS) is a measure of accumulated deficits assessed by means of a standard neurological examination. We compared the responsiveness of the MSIS with that of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We reviewed 4300 records collected systematically from 1995 to 2003 and identified 534 patients who had clinically definite multiple sclerosis and had had at least two clinical assessments with a time interval of 2-5 years. The rate of deterioration was significantly higher on the MSIS than on the EDSS. The annualized change in EDSS exhibited a maximum at baseline EDSS 4 and a subsequent rapid decline at higher baseline EDSS, while the annualized change in MSIS was fairly stable over a wide middle range of baseline MSIS. The variance of the annualized change in EDSS fluctuated markedly between the baseline EDSS categories, being highest at baseline EDSS 2, while the variance of the annualized change in MSIS was stable. The study indicates that the responsiveness of the MSIS is better than that of the EDSS in terms of both magnitude and stability over the range of measurement",
author = "M Ravnborg and M Blinkenberg and F Sellebjerg and M Ballegaard and Larsen, {S Helweg} and S{\o}rensen, {P Soelberg}",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "81--4",
journal = "Multiple Sclerosis Journal",
issn = "1352-4585",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responsiveness of the Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale in comparison with the Expanded Disability Status Scale

AU - Ravnborg, M

AU - Blinkenberg, M

AU - Sellebjerg, F

AU - Ballegaard, M

AU - Larsen, S Helweg

AU - Sørensen, P Soelberg

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - The Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale (MSIS) is a measure of accumulated deficits assessed by means of a standard neurological examination. We compared the responsiveness of the MSIS with that of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We reviewed 4300 records collected systematically from 1995 to 2003 and identified 534 patients who had clinically definite multiple sclerosis and had had at least two clinical assessments with a time interval of 2-5 years. The rate of deterioration was significantly higher on the MSIS than on the EDSS. The annualized change in EDSS exhibited a maximum at baseline EDSS 4 and a subsequent rapid decline at higher baseline EDSS, while the annualized change in MSIS was fairly stable over a wide middle range of baseline MSIS. The variance of the annualized change in EDSS fluctuated markedly between the baseline EDSS categories, being highest at baseline EDSS 2, while the variance of the annualized change in MSIS was stable. The study indicates that the responsiveness of the MSIS is better than that of the EDSS in terms of both magnitude and stability over the range of measurement

AB - The Multiple Sclerosis Impairment Scale (MSIS) is a measure of accumulated deficits assessed by means of a standard neurological examination. We compared the responsiveness of the MSIS with that of the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). We reviewed 4300 records collected systematically from 1995 to 2003 and identified 534 patients who had clinically definite multiple sclerosis and had had at least two clinical assessments with a time interval of 2-5 years. The rate of deterioration was significantly higher on the MSIS than on the EDSS. The annualized change in EDSS exhibited a maximum at baseline EDSS 4 and a subsequent rapid decline at higher baseline EDSS, while the annualized change in MSIS was fairly stable over a wide middle range of baseline MSIS. The variance of the annualized change in EDSS fluctuated markedly between the baseline EDSS categories, being highest at baseline EDSS 2, while the variance of the annualized change in MSIS was stable. The study indicates that the responsiveness of the MSIS is better than that of the EDSS in terms of both magnitude and stability over the range of measurement

M3 - Journal article

VL - 11

SP - 81

EP - 84

JO - Multiple Sclerosis Journal

JF - Multiple Sclerosis Journal

SN - 1352-4585

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 48569306