TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitive Assessment of Acute Optic Neuritis by a New, Digital Flicker Test

AU - Pihl-Jensen, Gorm

AU - Ivanov, Iliya

AU - Hinze, Desiree

AU - Trauzettel-Klosinski, Susanne

AU - Frederiksen, Jette Lautrup

N1 - © 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - BACKGROUND: The Aulhorn flicker test (AFT) previously showed promise in diagnosing acute optic neuritis (ON) albeit with suboptimal sensitivity. A new, digitalized version of the AFT (the DFT) has not previously been examined in acute ON.OBJECTIVES: To examine the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the DFT in acute ON.METHOD: The DFT assesses the subjective brightness of a flickering field (1-60 Hz). In normal subjects, brightness enhancement occurs at intermediate frequencies, whereas in acute ON darkness enhancement (DE) is hypothesized. AFT and DFT measurements were obtained in acute ON patients (≤31 days from first symptom) with DE as a quantitative covariate. Reproducibility of the DFT end point was assessed in the form of an intraclass correlation.RESULTS: 30 untreated first-time acute ON patients and 55 healthy controls were examined. AFT and DFT were performed 12.7 days (range: 4-30) following ON onset. The DFT showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.78-0.99) to a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). The AFT showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI = 0.56-0.90) to a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93-1.00). No significant correlation was shown between DFT and visual acuity. The intraclass correlation of the DFT end point in healthy subjects was 0.84.CONCLUSIONS: We present a new DFT in acute ON displaying a high specificity of 0.96 and a sensitivity of 0.93. Our study indicates the DFT to be an accurate and easy-to-use tool in diagnosing acute ON, which may be especially helpful in atypical cases.

AB - BACKGROUND: The Aulhorn flicker test (AFT) previously showed promise in diagnosing acute optic neuritis (ON) albeit with suboptimal sensitivity. A new, digitalized version of the AFT (the DFT) has not previously been examined in acute ON.OBJECTIVES: To examine the sensitivity, specificity and reproducibility of the DFT in acute ON.METHOD: The DFT assesses the subjective brightness of a flickering field (1-60 Hz). In normal subjects, brightness enhancement occurs at intermediate frequencies, whereas in acute ON darkness enhancement (DE) is hypothesized. AFT and DFT measurements were obtained in acute ON patients (≤31 days from first symptom) with DE as a quantitative covariate. Reproducibility of the DFT end point was assessed in the form of an intraclass correlation.RESULTS: 30 untreated first-time acute ON patients and 55 healthy controls were examined. AFT and DFT were performed 12.7 days (range: 4-30) following ON onset. The DFT showed a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI = 0.78-0.99) to a specificity of 0.96 (95% CI = 0.87-1.00). The AFT showed a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI = 0.56-0.90) to a specificity of 1.00 (95% CI = 0.93-1.00). No significant correlation was shown between DFT and visual acuity. The intraclass correlation of the DFT end point in healthy subjects was 0.84.CONCLUSIONS: We present a new DFT in acute ON displaying a high specificity of 0.96 and a sensitivity of 0.93. Our study indicates the DFT to be an accurate and easy-to-use tool in diagnosing acute ON, which may be especially helpful in atypical cases.

U2 - 10.1159/000503304

DO - 10.1159/000503304

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 31655815

VL - 63

SP - 332

EP - 340

JO - Ophthalmic Research

JF - Ophthalmic Research

SN - 0030-3747

IS - 3

ER -